Listen, I have two degrees. The first is a B.S. in Psychology with a Neuroscience emphasis, and the other is a B.A. in Cognitive Science. And anecdotally, I also have two children. I only state that so we can skip past all the talk of “bigotry”, and “stupid and annoying” generalizations. It doesn’t matter that we can’t compare to children 50 years ago, if we acknowledge that “x” has an impact on children and that “y%” of children are exposed to “x”, isn’t the outcome the same?
- 0 Posts
- 104 Comments
I’m a little confused why you don’t think there have been journaled studies on the differences between children with access to technology and those without. Some examples are impoverished communities and countries and people in strict religious sects. TV, radio, books, they have all had an impact on they way brains develop and process information. Biologically no, if you pluck a newborn and place them in North Sentinel Island, they will adapt perfectly. But that’s the thing, the human mind is meant to adapt to its surroundings. The surrounding of the majority of children today is being absolutely bombarded with distractions, and it has a measurable affect on behavior across the board.
And that is equally true.
The internet has drastically and measurably changed the behavior and attention span of children.
I’m happy you had a better childhood than most
I have a cow. She’s just a pet, we don’t milk her and I don’t eat beef.
Some stores have scanning from a phone, but for most it is much more cost effective to prevent theft in one place instead.
meliaesc@lemmy.worldto
memes@lemmy.world•I'm glad to be here with the rest of you old fogeys
2·4 months agoOn the internet, everything is known.
Appeasing rambling cults is not acceptable.
Americans are never taught human empathy or body language, so when we experience a basic critical thought, it must be magic and gods.
How would you quantify ongoing projects where workers come and go and each of their specific contribution might not be easy to measure? Do they all also assume financial responsibility for any failures or lawsuits?
meliaesc@lemmy.worldto
memes@lemmy.world•And all the antivaxxers I ever knew sure like recreational substances too.
3·5 months agoI’m on Mounjaro for diabetes, have lost 35 pounds in two months. It’s a tool, with potential side effects, but for me it has been a huge jump-start for a lot of neglected health issues and overall energy levels.
Wonderful perspective. Now, let’s compare that to the white population in poverty during the same time span.
-
Can all key differences be attributed to money? The acts of violence and unethical experiments were the result of being seen as property, as you said, which someone in poverty would not have to deal with by default. We can’t ignore the non-economical impacts of slavery.
-
What percentage of white and black children from impoverished homes went on to get an education or move to a different area? This comparison eliminates the bias from technological advances. If that number is greater than 0, then it proves people in poverty have the oppurtunity for growth, which is not possible under slavery.
If we want to snapshot a single moment by a single metric, yes, not having enough money to move may be comparable to not being allowed to move by your owner. But I don’t think the overall situation is close enough to say they are the functionally the same.
-
When slavery was abolished in the United States, all of the former slaves immediately moved to the desolately impoverished category. By the time that they died, would you say that the quality of their lives, and that of their descendants, on average, improved, stayed the same, or was worse than before?
Being physically owned is functionally different from struggling to afford your choice of housing and cuisine. I am really not sure how you would like me to elaborate the complete lack of bodily autonomy and freedom. Being provided bare necessities does not functionally negate the inability to get educated, to choose a profession, to leave a property, to not get physically abused, to be separated from your family, to be denied thr right to marry, to be sold.
It wasn’t meant as any sort of insult, more of the trope of overanalizing innocuous things.
You sound like a high school English teacher.
I was just responding to your statement about “people who dont know jack about psychology”, so that we could have a more informed discussion. 🙂