Pepeyes@sopuli.xyz to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agorulesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square76linkfedilinkarrow-up1632arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1632arrow-down1imagerulesopuli.xyzPepeyes@sopuli.xyz to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agomessage-square76linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePixxlMan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 years agoIt’s not about whether it’s a chromium browser or not. It’s about whether a browser is “trusted” and installed from a “trusted” source, like the windows store… Basically gatekeeping. Still, Firefox and any browser could still be approved.
minus-squareKühe sind toll@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 years agoThis would be an insane damage to the Linux community since there are many different ways to install programms(including browsers).
minus-squareSynthead@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 years agoWhat’s more trusted than source code?
minus-squareCaptPretentious@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoOr the API can die a quick death, like so many other Google products.
It’s not about whether it’s a chromium browser or not. It’s about whether a browser is “trusted” and installed from a “trusted” source, like the windows store… Basically gatekeeping. Still, Firefox and any browser could still be approved.
This would be an insane damage to the Linux community since there are many different ways to install programms(including browsers).
What’s more trusted than source code?
Or the API can die a quick death, like so many other Google products.