𝓒𝔂𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓑𝓸𝔂@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agoflag rulefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up140arrow-down10
arrow-up140arrow-down1imageflag rulefiles.catbox.moe𝓒𝔂𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓑𝓸𝔂@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-squareJadenSmith@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoApparently, since 1959, the arrangement must entail “nine rows of stars staggered horizontally and eleven rows of stars staggered vertically.” https://www.si.edu/spotlight/flag-day/flag-facts#:~:text=Executive Order of President Eisenhower dated August 21%2C 1959%2C provided,rows of stars staggered vertically.
minus-squarejayrhacker@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoThose are just executive orders, the flag code itself (which is a law) is a little vague.
minus-squarezaph@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoBecause getting congress to change a law after a new state is added gets a little annoying.
minus-squareb3nsn0w@pricefield.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agowhy must you bring facts and logic to this discussion?
Apparently, since 1959, the arrangement must entail “nine rows of stars staggered horizontally and eleven rows of stars staggered vertically.”
https://www.si.edu/spotlight/flag-day/flag-facts#:~:text=Executive Order of President Eisenhower dated August 21%2C 1959%2C provided,rows of stars staggered vertically.
Those are just executive orders, the flag code itself (which is a law) is a little vague.
Because getting congress to change a law after a new state is added gets a little annoying.
why must you bring facts and logic to this discussion?