• hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Beauty is definitely in the eye of the beholder, because that thing still looks like a low poly piece of shit to me. I do have terrible taste in general though, so take that as you will

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is definitely too low poly. The DMC-12 did it right. Then the Cyber truck tried to copy it without understanding why it worked aesthetically.

          • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I dare anyone to claim that the DeLorean didn’t look cool as all fuck (even without a flux capacitor)

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I was a hetro woman and wanted good sex I would find guys with the crappiest cars possible. Those guys got nothing to compensate for.

          Everytime I see a cybertruck or BMW or an oversized pickup I just think “nice car, sorry about the ED. You know they have a pill for that now?”

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            My 3-door sub-compact and I agree. Lol

            I’ve also noticed car size is directly proportional to willingness to admit being wrong. Never debate a guy with a Land Rover.

  • Alexxxolotl@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hold on. Apologies for being out of the loop, but do people really bring sexual fetish stuff to a pride parade?

    And if so, what does that have to do with LGBTQ+?

    • Shapillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imho there are two angles to this question:

      • First, queer folks are more likely to be kinky. Since they had to figure out what clicks for them at least once, they tend to do it on multiple aspects of their identities.
      • Secondly - and this one is more of a personal standpoint - I’d argue that kinks fall under the wider umbrella of queerness or GRSM (Gender Relational and Sexual Minorities which I find way better than an enumeration acronym).

      I’d also advocate for including neurodivergences under the queer brand too for instance.

      • chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also don’t forget the historic aspect – when queerness was viewed as sexually deviant and perverted, it was the kink community that stood by us. Just because we’ve evolved to be socially acceptable doesn’t mean we should leave everyone else behind