python is worse than js, imo

it is actually about 70 separate programs designed from the ground up to work really well together. But since it’s one project and they are developed together, it automatically is considered a monolith and “goes against the unix philosophy”

gameplay doesn’t matter. If it’s written in rust it will automatically be fun.

and that’s how docker was invented

both of them. The rest of the world has moved on

this is what the open source community refuses to understand. If you want to go mainstream, you need to give users less choice. There is one windows, there is one macos, but one struggles to describe just what a linux distro even is.

it should run chatgpt on every cell with the prompt ‘if you had to interpret the value “$VALUE” as a date, what would be the date?’, and then replace each cell’s value with the answer.

no, the strongest and fastest weakened the egg for you, then you just strolled right in and took all the glory.

but if not, and they have two or more children ic tje amount gets split between them. Then you handlo those, and their children etc. It’s financial homeopathy

but we aren’t any closer to agi than we were in the 50’s. $100 billion in revenue for openai won’t be any closer to agi either.

i’d say it’s closer to 105

because of the “perceptual” part.

A normal hash has the property that it produces wildly different hashes for even the tiniest of changes in the file.

Perceptual hashing flips that requirement on its head, and therefore makes finding a suitable hash function much harder.

if you want to have a reliable driverless system, you’re going to have to invent trains… again

They want AI because apple tells them they do.

They also don’t want AI because their experiences say the opposite.

yes to all of those…

ceo of a US health insurance company

humans aren’t inherently evil. Most aren’t, I agree. But some just are.

bruce wayne does in fact fight crime with money too. But it’s not enough, so he also needs to be the batman.

yeah, so that means that it’s not incremental improvement on what we have that we need. That will get us nowhere. We need a (as yet unknown) completely different approach. Which is the opposite of incremental improvement.

because, having coded them myself, I am under no illusions as to their capabilities. They are not magic. “just” some matrix multiplications that generate a probability distribution for the next token, which is then randomly sampled.