Give them fun names but please STOP using them as official repo/distribution names.

Life would be so much easier if the repository was debian15. Same problem when looking up Docker images.

Then you won’t have to double check everytime if you are talking about a newer/older version, etc.

Try PipePipe, a better fork of NewPipe

Old news

Didn’t you know we are moving to Delta.Chat? 😅

Read here or essentially all the comments of this post.

Freely learn THE CODE, and HOW IT’S BUILT. And then you can improve upon it. That’s what open source, and libre software in particular is.

Dataset bias? You have the code. Make it your own bias.

OpenAI tries to keep knowledge to itself not realising there are tens of millions of people around the world with computers, free time, and the WWW to share it.

You got it completely wrong.

Say whatever, but some open sourced it and others have not, despite their misleading “OpenAI” name. So, +1000 points to DeepSeek.

This is how you make progress for all humanity. Allowing people to freely learn, improve, modify, and share.

I know that “g!” works, but the correct way is “!g”.

This is my (controversial) tip: ask an LLM. It works wonderfully for these cases. “Give me an ffmpeg command that cuts the last X seconds of a video in a lossless manner, stabilizes it and speeds it up 200%”.

You can then checkout those commands on the manual/online to verify.

Sorry but your argument is absolutely false. Even if Firefox is not the most private browser ever, it’s waaaay more private than Chrome. And you can even make it better with a couple of toggles.

Or… “Chrome company” could strike a deal with Google and keep an exclusive integration with Chrome, in exchange of all of users metadata. Capitalis*m.

I guess you could keep Chrome as it is running in another company… But Chrome is Google-service-clogged Chromium, still making money for Google and changing literally nothing in terms of monopolistic behavior by Google. I don’t see the benefit in this division.

Chrome or Chromium? Because it’s logically impossible to have Chrome without Google.

Also there is no casino algorithm showing you what big data knows will make you stay for a while.

In TikTok or instagram reels, you don’t follow people you like. You just watch stuff happening.

That’s an actual great point, noted.

They won’t. They’ll just substitute them. The idea is trying to force every company do the same thing, as making people work locally makes them more dependent on their local company and less likely to jump to a better job.

Then you can lower salaries (not rise them) and destroy benefits. Also you can enforce dress codes to make it look like a dictatorship country like North Korea.

Is that American hand writing? It reminds me so much of James Hetfield’s, and basically no one writes like that in my country.

Oh I am very sorry, I think I did not express myself properly. I wasn’t particularly referring to you, but rather the typical user who will answer to the “Musk is one of the richest” with the “company value” thing.

I do think tho that whatever your opinion on Musk’s companies is, the market clearly thinks otherwise, which banks are part of it.

Also, I strongly dislike Musk. But it’s very clear to me that he has enough power to do whatever he wants like wasting lots of money trying new things until something sticks.

He might not be now, but like a year ago he was the richest human ever. I don’t think he’s fallen from the top 20. And that is just the official numbers. Imagine what might be hidden.

And don’t come to me with the “but shares are not money”. Shares are basically money, and you can even use them to convince banks to give you more.