“Why save billions, when we can save millions?”

No, this is recombination

Incremental scientific research delivers new possible features -> funding hype to be first to market -> engineering builds products based on new tech -> people learn what it can and cannot do through use -> hype dies and funding dries up (you are here for LLMs) -> less funding stops engineering new products and research continues incremental changes until repeat.

TLDR: AI works on goverment funding.

Wrong format. DD.MM.YYYY.

“13.1.25”, not “13/1/25”.

82$?! That’s ~8200 roubles! Holy golden expensive fuck!

Normal people distribution

Erased by obrital friendship canon.

Now you can

My country speedran capitalistic invasion in 30 years. Or 23. Depends how you count it.

When was he promoted from Musk’s vice president?

I think it’s the other way around: only psychopaths can become corporate execs

I’d add a third slice to the second pie: steal your way there.

That is expliotation of working class

and claimed as their own

You are talking about either right for name or right of authorship. I don’t remember which is which, but in normal countries(aka in Europe) it is inalienable right, unlike copyright, which can be sold.

If you want copyright THAT badly, you should demand making it inalienable instead of protecting status quo of total publisher’s control.

EDIT: right for name is to have your name on art, right of authorship is to call yourself author.

EDIT2: copytight outside of capitalism just does not make sense.

Yes! So much better statement.

It isn’t an oval, it is ellipse.

You are overexaggerating under assumption that there will exist social and economic system based on greed and death threats, which sounds very unreali-- Right, capitalism.

criticizing genAI from a copyright

There is russian phrase “fight of beaver and donkey”, which loosely means fight of two shits. Copyright is cancer and capitalist abuse of genAI is cancer.

Train, backpropogate, optimize.

My Little Glasses: Optics is Magic