I’m here to stay.
I also bookmarked the Librewolf Flatpak package. I consider to change my browser (Firefox) for the first time in 20 years or so, since its inception. I do not rely on the Mozilla account, so the switch should be easier for me. Passwords should be compatible I assume. In worst case you can export and import passwords.
They do not get ownership, but a license to do what they want with it. Giving a license does not change ownership, yes they are correct with this.
I think you misunderstand the point here. The upgrade in this case means a plus in version number, that’s what is said here. I was not implying that older versions of Rust Editions get obsolete.
That’s the case with every software updates. Upgrading just means that you jumped to the newer version. Like upgrading to the newest Firefox won’t give everyone the same benefit instantly, but its an upgrade in version nonetheless (as an analogy to Rust version).
Given enough money, everything in the market is for sale. This is just a tactic to make the value higher.
Paid subreddits. I mean look at the free to play live service games, how people like to buy stuff that not everyone has. We can laugh as much as we want and think how dumb this is. But people are dumber. It will drive away some people from Reddit, most won’t care and just stay using the “Free” stuff. Some will pay for the subreddits.
Maybe NSFW content or support subreddits for paying customers.
That’s because they had not the money to pay for.
Copyright violation doesn’t get you arrested.
The distribution doesn’t matter, as long as you can install Steam on it.
It lets you have a local configuration that keep tracks of what videos you watched and allows for custom playlists. Without a Google account. I don’t know if a smartphone app is available, as I only use it on my PC.
FreeTube + integrated SponsorBlock
It blocks normal ads, plus Sponsored segments and some other segments if you wish to. Its configurable. This addon is also available for Firefox. I do not use Firefox to watch YouTube anymore.
Most people using a smartphone use the default YouTube app. And that app does not have any ability to block ads. Most people don’t know they can block ads or even if they did, they don’t know how.
Using another LLM model to fine tune it and then saying they spend a fraction of the money of those who created the model its based on, is just ironic. They used the Google model and fine tuned it. Its like someone building a car for millions of Dollars, I take the car and make some changes for much less money. Then I claim that I build a car for 50 Dollars. This is the level of logic we are dealing with.
I think that I can decide better than an Ai tool if a text is written by an Ai. Not a fan of this. I find it weird to use an Ai tool, to detect Ai text. Also I wonder if those Ai fake tools can utilize Fakespot detection to improve the actual fakeness. They can train their Ai until Fakespot does not detect anymore.
They talk about their proprietary model, plus several other tools. Highlight any text online and request an analysis. Nowhere in the article, the download page and their Fakespot website is once mentioned if this is local and offline. So, I’m 99% sure the data is sent to their server for analyzing the highlighted text.
I think its only about the iPhone released in China. So the US Bill has nothing to say there. From article:
But despite the heavy marketing for its AI features Apple is yet to introduce them in China which is a major region for the iPhone.
One major reason that Apple Intelligence has still not made its way to China is that the company needed to approve an AI model that would run it.
What are you talking about? What bad faith are you saying to me? I ask you to show me the repository that contains the source code. There is none. Please give me a link to the repo you have in mind. Where is the source code and training data of DeepSeek-R1? Can we build the model from source?
Nobody releases training data. It’s too large and varied.
That’s why its not Open Source. They do not release the source and its impossible to build the model from source.
Can you actually explain what in my reply is “Fear, uncertainty, and doubt”? Did you actually read it? I even linked to the specific github repository, which is basically empty. You just link to an overview, which does not point to any source code.
Please explain whats FUD and link to the source code, otherwise do not call people FUD if you don’t know what you are talking about.
Good to know. I was wondering if this would happen and what I would do about it. Somehow the Thunderbird team seems to work completely independent from Mozilla. They also make quite good money from donations, so there is less of a reason to search for additional revenue.