• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: May 1st, 2024

help-circle


  • thejoker954@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    No. “Machine learning” is the root of the tree.

    Or to steal another commenters attempts to have me call it that - that would be like calling a chihuahu a wolf.

    Machine learning -> neural net -> LLM. Thats the basic “path”. I dont CARE if LLM is technically wrong when using machine learning or neural net is also inaccurate.

    If anything yall should be arguing for me to call it ASR 2.0



  • thejoker954@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    26 days ago

    I have to disagree with you. Ai is never a more accurate way to describe what we have now. Not until they call true ai something different.

    I know its a weird hill to die on, but die on it I will. Calling one artifical intelligence and one virtual intelligence could work.

    Also it’s my understanding that LLMs are considered a type of neural net so I don’t see it being more accurate to call it a neural net vs a llm.

    And they are all subsets of machine learning so calling it an ml model leads me back to the same issue I have with “ai”. (And the same reason those loser usb fucks can suck a bag of dildos) lack of clairty of what it actually can do.


  • thejoker954@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    26 days ago

    If you use any generic LLM then yes, but there are LLMs (like i said in another reply - its prrobably not a LLM - but as there is no ‘real’ ai that’s what I’m calling all this ai bullshit) That are trained specifically for captioning/transcripts, just not necessarily done in real time.

    Doing it “live” is what increases the error rate.


  • thejoker954@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    While speech to text software indeed predates LLMs - LLMs do it as well. I’ve only tried a few basic (aka free) options so no idea how well they do en masse, but the generated results were at least on par if not better than YouTubes’ auto caption.

    It might not technically be LLMs though. It could be a different type of “ai”. I Just cant stand the “ai” marketing when nothing they are making is actually ai so until they pull their heads out their asses all “ai” models are LLMs to me.