I mean, I think “improperly obtained OpenAI’s data” with reference to China, probably means internal trade secrets were stolen. Wouldn’t be the first time China hacked a US corporation and stole all their IP, lol.

https://brilliant.org/wiki/proof-of-divisibility-rules/

The 7 and 13 rules are pretty cool too.

Yep. If the sun of the numbers is divisible by 3, the number is divisible by three.

Works great for 6 too, as if it’s divisible by 3 and even, the number is divisible by 6.

And 9 is the same thing, but the sum has to be divisible by 9 (e.g. 12384 is divisible by 9 because the sum of the digits is 18, which is divisible by 9)

There’s also good rules for 4 and 8 as well. If the last 2 digits are divisible by 4, the whole number is (e.g. 127924 is divisible by 4 because 24 is) and if the last 3 numbers are divisible by 8, the whole number is (e.g. 12709832 is divisible by 8 because 832 is.)

True, but I don’t know why you’d reload after 8 if that were the case.

Oh dang, did the new remaster go back and redo all the Vivian dialogue to match the original Japanese!?

I was already stoked for this game, but that’s got me double stoked!!!

Is there a good Go community on Lemmy?

/r/baduk is definitely one of the old subreddits I do miss.

I’ll mention Fez since I think people forgot about it in the wake of all the Phil Phish drama.

Excellent game that I think fits this bill.

Surely there’s a limit though, right? Like, you’re not a proponent of bum fights are you? Just because someone is agreeing to do something for money doesn’t make it inherently ethical.

My response was in reference to the comment the guy above linked to. The one by WallEx.

That post was claiming animals didn’t live longer in captivity, but was taking animals raised for meat into account.

To be fair, he’s not contradicting the intended statement. “Animals in captivity” usually refers to zoos/aquariums/etc in this context.

They are just pointing out that animals raised for food are also “animals in captivity,” and have dramatically reduced lifespans.

I don’t know that I understand the “under capitalism” distinction here.

Like, I get that the point is that capital is influential, skewing the vote in favor of those who have it.

I just think that even in non-capitalistic systems there will invariably be some other proxy token for power that will be equally influential.

I don’t think the problem outlined is one that is fixed under any system.

Probably dumb question, but what’s the game in the top left panel?