Struwwelpeter

Edit: spelling

Thank you for the far more detailed (and correct!) explanation.

~~You know the counting numbers? 1, 2, 3, so on?

There’s infinitely many.

But there’s fewer of them than the “reals”, which are numbers like 1.5, 42.7, and pi (basically all the whole numbers and all the ones in between).

This diagram is showing the “Continuum Hypothesis” which says that there might be some set of numbers that are “in between” the counting numbers and the reals in terms of size. We (humanity) do not yet know for certain if it’s true or not.

This is obviously a gross oversimplification that probably gets some important details wrong.~~

Those young machine spirits need their rest

Most AIs are trained on older poster art like this - they’re well labelled, have consistent style, and because they’re older there are likely to be a bunch of duplicates in the training set.

Pretty sure this one predates AI art.

It’s from 1986

It’s Loss

Obligatory xckd what if

Uninterruptible sleep makes this harder than it looks

If the set of definitions contains the word set, does the English language implode in a recursive cascade of paradoxes?

Large companies that serve a ton of content. CDNs, image hosts, Google, Facebook, etc. 1% of their traffic adds up to a lot.

Also people in limited bandwidth situations - satellite links, Antarctica, developing countries, airplanes, etc.

Finally, embedded systems. The esp32 for example has 520kb of ram.

Weetabix would like a word