🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖

They didn’t like that one lol

Trump uses hyperbole to entertain his voter base (because the average American voter has the IQ of a house brick) doesn’t mean he is literally going to war. Nor was he calling for death, he was in fact calling for the application of the law to criminals (quite the opposite of vigilante executions). What exactly has trump done to lgb and disabled people that he hasn’t done to other people. I don’t see any gay camps, any forced conversion therapy, any disabled ramp removal etc etc.

Yeah your culture is a reality TV show. During ur last election my mates and I where sitting around taking bets on the stock market while joking about how we might as well make the most of the final season of the usa.

And calling these people fascists that’s a little extreme imo. Both sides of the us politics see each other as the worst imaginable thing. Extremist speech by the other side is what both sides use to justify violence. If u have read any Roman history this is how the fall of Rome happened. Also the average empire in history lasts 250years the USA is 149years old. Good luck my friend its gonna get real messy and both sides hate you they are different flavours of the same corrupt greed.

Hey ur the first person to engage in good faith thanks. Extremists on either side are bad I feel like Charlie was advocating for speech between people to prevent exactly this extremism. Sadly I fear they will use it as justification to do extremism in response.

If ur gonna be placing bets like that it won’t look good if the shooter turns out to be trans or extreme left.

I’m not American I’m enjoying my freedom over here in Australia. Just warning you that this isn’t the game u wanna be playing considering ur opponent has more guns and more military service.

45% of republicans own guns, 20% of democrats own guns. 63% of veterans are republicans 35% of veterans are democrats I don’t like ur odds.

So u are justifying violence for speech. Depends on your definition of violence. Calling for death that’s a problem hurting someone else’s feelings completely fine.

Don’t worry u have already done the justifying for me. I’m so glad u support my plan to improve society.

I will engage with that question the second you engage with mine in good faith.

Saying violence for people exercising free speech is wrong gets right wing nut tag? I would say justifying murder for people exercising speech is fascist activity but what would I know?

You justify violence for speech the real fascists use it to kill you. Think before you do your enemies work for them.

You really do seem like a joyous person. I would advise against justifying violence in response to speech. The right supports him, the right owns most of the guns, the right make up most of the military, you may justify violence in response to speech but you won’t win.

I’d recommend starting with this comment section.

The right supports him. The right owns a majority of guns. I would advise against justifying political violence cos you won’t win.

No not what I said at all. Violence in response to speech is what I said. I would recommend working on your comprehension skills.

I think he would be a little more respectful than that. Plus u missed my point what do u think the right (who own a majority of guns) are going to do in response?

Fancy way of justifying violence against speech. You are the problem.

Violence in response to speech is not a good thing for a liberal society. If one side of politics does it the other will be forced to respond on the same level.

Surprisingly not as useful as u would think unfortunately

The best beer is a free beer. The second best is cold.