Getting kinda hot in these rhinos…

Oh look it’s me and my sexual fantasies

Well now it needn’t reflect the man.

but whatever it is, it’s got Russian dressing.

However If we follow your lead it could be chopped big macs tossed in Russian dressing?

I’d eat a trump salad. Can we take care of the middle steps that get us there?

It’s mostly been explained.

Basically it’s content delivery networks. Caching. That ad, from start to finish, has been queued up and loaded and played for thousands of people near you. This is less frequently the case with some show that you’re streaming.

It’s the same reason that if you were to go watch trending YouTube videos, they will load up a lot faster than if you find some niche YouTube video from 12 years ago that no one’s watched in a decade.

What’re you rich?

Eating McDonald’s for 3 meals a day every day would be between $5k and $15k per year.

Cash.

So, that would represent about $10k-$30k of your pre-taxed Income

For me it’s like 9 months of chaos followed by 3 months of riding the wave. Over and over.

Yo even homies headphones are a throwback.

You know he was using that with this on his trips to and from school every day.

The scariest part is the media’s unwillingness to say what happened.

Some DPRK shit.

Donny Don’t! 🔪

Right? I’m mass texting my deliveries “hey I’m out front with about 12 other orders. If you need it delivered to your door here it’ll be a few extra minutes. I’ll head into the building to complete any remaining deliveries at [time]”

More people need to understand that the police quite literally protect land owners and business owners.

If you rent and are an employee, the police basically don’t work for you. Your tax contribution to their project puts you on the other side, until you’re in the “land tax” or “I generate taxes on others” club, their actual goal is to extract more money out of you through fines or actual enslavement.

Doug Stanhope used to run a celebrity death betting pool where you could bet on which celebrity would be the next to die.

No idea if it was legal lol.

If I end up homeless there is no question.

You’re gonna gimme room and board to avoid a war and die a hero? Say less.

Can we gamble on how long they have left?

That’d be some good old fashioned capitalism.

Our biggest cyber security risk is an attack on a furry convention.

Yeah I’m down with that concession.

Let me say fuck anyone really who can’t get here?

I’m allowing more than I am comfortable with on lyrical of argument.

500M is not only ridiculous but achievable given our agreement.

I mean yes and no.

Yes, no one needs more than $10 million. But there are legitimate use cases for wealth far beyond that. Let’s imagine someone develops an immutable cryptocurrency tool that is used globally to track political spending and keep governments honest. Hypothetically, this tool revolutionizes transparency and unravels corruption on a massive scale. Shouldn’t the creator of something so transformative be allowed to enjoy significant wealth—enough to provide for their family, loved ones, and even those who helped them along the way?

That kind of lasting wealth—the kind that lets someone own $10 million estates worldwide, fully staffed, with taxes paid indefinitely—is realistically covered at $1 billion. It’s feasible at $100 million, but it’s not at $10 million. A $10 million cap is “personal freedom money,” but it’s not “dynasty money.” And while dynasty wealth can be problematic, it’s also worth acknowledging the good that such wealth has sometimes enabled.

I love it when athletes, for example, use their success to buy their parents a million-dollar home or fund life-changing initiatives. If we cap wealth at $10 million, it prevents figures like LeBron James, Cristiano Ronaldo (love or hate him), Serena Williams, David Beckham, or even Rob Dyrdek from reaching the level of wealth where they can fund truly transformative projects.

Allowing higher wealth ceilings enables people who do reinvest in society to make a broader impact. Sure, some of these incentives are tax-driven, but the outcome still benefits society.

I get that not everyone uses their wealth for good. But there’s a meaningful gap between a $10 million cap and a $1 billion cap where good things can and do happen.

Can we negotiate to $500 million as a compromise?

I just think that at $1BN net worth or whatever, you start getting taxed on 99.99% of everything you earn or gain in worth after that.

This way people still get stupid rich, and if someone ever has $10bn you can easily just sound the alarm then and there and say nope, fuck this guy.

The tax curve just just be exponential and it should be basically vertical at $1bn.

It would be one of the first times I’d be proud to be an American in my entire life.