That explains why the ten thousand years of recorded history is filled with random violence and wars, but the point that I’m making is that things like Dictionaries and Encyclopedias and other written records should decide what is correct. They do indeed adapt over time when they have deemed things have sufficiently changed to update the definitions.

Just like how scientists decide what is science, historians decide what is history, so too should linguists decide what is proper use of a specific language.

If they’re making a mistake in public and it leads to repercussions for all of us, better to correct their mistake.

I’m going to disagree here on the basis that this logic leads to bubbles of people thinking they’re right when they’re not even close to a majority.

Thats fair, but I don’t make exceptions for that alone. We’re talking about advocates of widespread war and dictatorships.

I think from the start, the very beginning, Lemmy had bots doing 20 to 40 upvotes on brand new posts spouting Russian Propoganda.

Its really trivial to set up in decentralized networks like this.

From that study:

“red light running photo enforcement installed experienced 4 percent reduction in fatal crashes for intersections with multilane approaches, and 48 percent reduction for intersections with single-lane approaches.”

Reduction means LESS.

I can condone taking down pedestrian surveillance, but people who drive cars should follow the rules or get fucked.

I’m pretty sure the XFL only existed between 2020 and 2023

Well it isn’t beneficial for the company because people might realize they hold unpopular opinions and the company wants to be able to control the people’s opinions regardless of popularity, that way they can keep users on the site engaging with that content for longer.

I’m on the fence with the thumbs vs stars. On one hand, a boolean is probably better than an integer for a number of reasons. Another thing to consider is that the five star system can be gamed by only giving 0 or 5 depending on if you believe the content deserves a higher or lower average, meaning people who figure that out have more voting power… which is… better?

Yeah, it’s the definition of the word. Can be really confusing if you live in a country that has a Liberal Party which are usually about as Liberal as the DPRK is Democratic, a People’s Republic, or Korea.

You said you’re not a liberal, so you don’t support human rights.

So you’re a leftist who opposes human rights?

He’s not wrong, I’ve seen the spider girls communities.

I think DeepMind proved in 2022 that it would never reach 95% accuracy to human input even with infinite power and training data, as a response to the OpenAI research paper with similar findings that accurately predicted the performance of each new model after the paper was published.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.08361

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.15556

So it causes more harm or loss than benefit. So it’s not useful.

“When it works” it creates the need for oversight because “when it doesn’t work” it creates massive liabilities.

If it costs more than the benefit then it isn’t even useful.

Don’t rely on it for anything

FTFY

Yeah sounds cool but do you remember their genders?

Just missing the green food coloring and it’s Andre3000’s order