Well, actually, anybody can edit Wikipedia and the page updates immediately.

How do people even find the legitimate sites for Win apps these days? I mostly can’t. Even the legitimate github repos occasionally link to Sourceforge wtf

This sounds like an exaggeration though.

To me it seems like these researchers are saying the switch is confusing and complicated. That is not to say that Apple secretly collect data after lying to their users.

The problem with Siri, first example, is more about Apple’s (characteristic) terminology garbage. Siri’s voice control has nothing to do with Siri’s search suggestion, yet they marketed both as Siri. Actually, you can turn them both off, but since the voice control is just called Siri, they confused their users.

That’s different from "collecting data even when supposedly disabled.

(Tbf, even if they were better termed, my mom would still manage to confuse herself… mo matter what Apple do, the average user won’t be able to turn off anything.)

That said, there’s no point trying to convince someone on the internet anyway, and so I don’t really know why I wrote this comment.

I don’t like Lemmy’s stance on mod features, but I still don’t appreciate people who stress devs to add features because users are the most important.

It should instead be we will not use your software otherwise.

The problem with this narrative is that Musk lost money doing so.

Glad to hear :) What I mean is that Rust vectors and arrays are, for example, very similar to C++ vectors and arrays.

It must become illegal for a video game not to integrate this system

Nice summary. I’m wondering if comparison with C++ may help, because Rusts’ data structure design overlaps with C++ 's STL considerably. Another thing is that Geek for Geeks is not reliable, generally speaking.

Or they don’t want the tool of specifically the CCP.

you’re right. I should’ve written some people

The current internet search is becoming obsolete. People are able to tell apart BS, though. This means, there’s a possibility for a smarter filter. Hard to tell whether we will see one in the near-future.

I know, but arstechnica could also write other kinds of articles.

Why is arstechnica so cynical about specifically big tech?

deleted by creator

During a closed-door meeting last week, Professor Ester Fuchs, who is one of the chairs of the task force, invoked a Supreme Court justice’s famous line about pornography: “I know it when I see it.”

Lmao

Nah, you can do peaceful protests that would give incentives to Biden.

So, no, not only. Also not that I think that way.

That’s why Uncommitted is pointless. Thanks for confirming.

Agreed. If you vote for Biden anyway, he doesn’t have the incentive to care.

Do they wait for the next 4 years to do this again? I like the intention but honestly don’t understand the point.

What boggles my mind is that the level of sandboxing displayed in Apple’s App Store is not really interpretable to me.

I also see something like “the developers indicated they do not collect sensitive information.” Yeah, but why would they indicate otherwise if they were malicious parties?

Probably, the only way to get sort of assurance is to choose an open source project, but App Store doesn’t guarantee that the code on Github matches the app in the Store.

Well, to be precise, kbin groups posts with the same URL.