drkt

That battery history graph is so cool

It’s not for no reason, JPG and PNG suck ass

Support JXL

You can stretch it that far but there doesn’t exist a flatpak of pcmanfm anywhere. They’d have to have enough intimate knowledge of Linux and flatpak to build that themselves but then be so stupid as to format a question as poorly as my example?

I should note that it went on to tell me to run some flatpak override commands which I know would break flatpak, so it’s definitely making up stuff.

ChatGPT has become so intensely agreeable that you can actually ask it a bunch of technobabble that even someone who wouldn’t know better would recognize as technobabble and it will agree with you. See pic

I can post the details here.

please do!

Everything I can see about this project still puts it far ahead of WiGLE- using OSM and not an outdated API key for gmaps, a website developed in this century, etc

This is awesome. I tried WiGLE some years back and they wouldn’t let me pull much data out at all despite contributing so I’m into this.

I need it

I’m never using a Chromium browser again in my life but Mozilla hates winning so we just have 2 bad browsers.

Whomst’ve stock value am I protecting by pointing out that you were wrong on a factual statistic

Who are you, Pierre Spray? Of course it siphoned money out of the peoples hands, that’s what America does. That doesn’t mean the plane doesn’t work. Also no, I’m not gonna respond to all 6 of you. You all have the same point.

You are wrong about the statistics and none of you have owned up to that and the only one who actually went and checked (presumably) when I pointed it out is weaseling his way out of it with disingenuous language instead of just saying the number, because they know that they’d look dumb if if they said less than 30 of over 900 built have crashed and less than half of those were actually a plane malfunction and not operator error or a fucking experimental test frame. It’s easier to say “many crash” than to give a number and leave it up to the reader to interpret whatever that means. It’s also easy to imply that the planes are broken and non-functional two-thirds of the time by implying that basic-ass maintenance standards are somehow a bad thing. There does not exist a fighter jet which does not sit in a hangar or below deck for most of its life. The F35 is more complex than the planes it replaced and is full of exotic materials, so of course it requires more maintenance.

Please understand that I also hate America- I just base my hatred in factual reality.

The inevitable collapse of the west is going to come as complete shock to people like you.

It’s not, but I’m sure that’s hard to believe when you need to hate me because I disagreed with you on a point of factual statistics.

The writing is on the wall but you are just to smug and self assured to even contemplate it.

I don’t know what this has to be with the F35 failure rate

ultimately you’ve been hoodwinked by a very effective propaganda machine that is going to feed you into a mulcher to prolong the failing Western hegemony.

We’re being fed to the same mulcher, man. You’re not owning class, we’re both gonna die in World War 3.

It seems like you have a lot of assumptions about me and what I believe

you can actually look up how many have crashed and, you won’t but if you do, please tell me how many crashed because the plane shat itself and how many crashed because of operator error

oh sorry its a tankie instance I’ll be on my way

carry on

is this supposed to be a dunk on the F35? Did you read the article?

hairy christler!