JID (Jabber/XMPP, a federated messenger from 1999, get off my lawn matrix): cwagner@cwagner.me

  • 1 Post
  • 93 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2023

help-circle

  • And I see how you’d write an excited article about it.

    Just to be clear, this is co-written by Peter Norvig, co-author “of the most popular textbook in the field of AI: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach used in more than 1,500 universities in 135 countries”.

    They somehow completely failed to address the interesting and well discussed arguments.

    While I don’t agree with his conclusions, I felt like he discussed a lot of arguments. Note that he doesn’t argue for consciousness.

    edit: Mentioned that it’s co-written by him, he’s not the sole author. Though the co-author of the article, Blaise Agüera y Arcas, is also not some random person who just got into AI.



  • Very much disagreeing with the article. The current frontier AIs barely have intelligence, they are nowhere close to AGI.

    Don’t get me wrong, LLMs are amazing, and I love using them for anything (actually mostly for private things because the results for work related stuff usually suck), but there is little intelligence. Even GPT4, which is pretty much best-of-breed with a huge distance (GPT 3.5 reminds me of a scifi book I once read that had “artificial stupids”), is basically just generating text that sounds similar to what was on the internet

    Yeah, you can use them for all kinds of tasks, but it’s very awkward. And certainly not intelligent.

    edit: This is not to say the article is not worth your while, I’d actually highly recommend it.

    edit2: I’m also neither eloquent nor smart enough, compared to the author, to write a proper rebuttal, so there’s that ;)