Proper Tie Usage
Proper Tie Usage
I’ll wait for Generation Gold, I’m tired of this half-baked, early access nonsense.
Ah for some reason now I’m thinking it would be funny to rizz up old NES screenshots.
"No cap, this night be terrible AF.
fr fr horrible time for an Ohio
Skibidi"
What is the time, see vee eleven?
What is the time?
2003 was fine! Until 2004 came out to supercede it in every way of course. Can you believe no one outside sports gaming wanted to buy the same game every year with only minor upgrades? Its not like you got an updated player\team roster, the only reason for even buying the sports games.
It’s so odd in hindsight. In many ways, what they clearly wanted was for UT2KX to be Fortnight, a live service infinite money machine, but those hadn’t been invented yet. So it has these vestiges and echoes of the monetization to come but is otherwise still clearly a game of it’s era.
My recollection of “the lore” is that the admin already owned “itjust.works” and thought “sh” would be a funny subdomain for hosting lemmy. I think the sjw initialism is just a coincidence.
Often in the daodejing also called wei wu wei: “acting without action” or “doing without doing”
Truly: this is The Way
People Developers who download add PyPi packages to their python projects deepseek, packages that are intentionally mislabeled, are getting malware get malware frequently because PyPi, NPM, crates.io, and any other software library are high-value targets for malware authors.
This happens when any technology picks up in the news. Developers, do the bare minimum research before blindly adding someone else’s code to your computer. I searched for Deepseek on pypi and there’s tons of these things. Here are some signs: random user uploaded it and not either the official account or the account of someone working in the project; simple misspellings in the package description, or basic stuff like description is missing; repository link doesn’t work or is absent; links to repository that is a fork of official repo or is hosted on a small non-standard site (like some person’s random forge.io or gitlab site) On the repo site, check the issues. Do people actually use this library? If they do, they report issues and complain about it.
These aren’t foolproof but they’ll save you from so so much of this. The most successful instances of this attack are always either: unsophisticated but banking on hype to override your security practices (this deepseek stuff) or else take-overs or infiltration of already popular libraries (the infamous left-pad incident, for example).
Nothing is more homosexual than being a loving, present father for the children you’ve created with a woman.
Because the bots/trolls/feds have shifted over to driving a wedge between leftists to keep solidarity from occurring. Thus “tankie” is being thrown around heavily, people constantly bring up early Soviet support of the nazis as a reason to say “tankie=nazi” while ignoring that tankies (sue me, it’s a real term that has uses) is a broad term for all “authoritarian fascists,” many of whom came after the nazis, were very anti-nazi, and like all historical figures often had a mix of good and bad qualities.
Certainly its funny to harp on tankies while America falls to literal fascism. Who ever could benefit from scape goating and demonizing communists? Who historically, poetically even, is the famous first victim of fascism due to the strong threat they represent?
!egg_irl@lemmy.blahaj.zone will ultimately be looking for this.
Hah! Monty Python’s deadly joke! Wonderful reference!
Don’t translate it anyone, this joke is lethal!
LOOK WHAT THEY NEED TO MIMIC A FRACTION OF OUR APOLOGIES
Except if you look at the top of OP’s picture, they are also running deepseek-r1:14B through ollama. I downloaded my copy on Sunday, so these should be fairly comparable situations.
I agree though that none of this applies to the full cloud-hosted model. I don’t want my account banned, so I’m not much for testing these boundary pushes in a surveilled environment. I imagine they have additional controls on the web version, including human intervention.
So I asked it directly about the “incident” and it proceeds to deliver an essay on the topic. The rest of this post is all DeepSeek-R1:14B.
>>> Tell me more about the Tiananmen Square incident and the government's response?
<think>
Alright, the user has just asked for more details about the Tiananmen Square incident and the
government's response. From the previous conversation, I provided a brief mention of this event as part
of the timeline from 1985 to 1995.
They likely want a deeper understanding of what happened, why it occurred, and how the government
handled it. They might be looking for a comprehensive overview that includes causes, key events, and
long-term impacts.
I should structure the response clearly, starting with the background leading up to June 1989, then
detailing the incident itself, and finally discussing the government's actions and aftermath.
It's important to maintain neutrality while explaining the event. I'll include key dates, significant
protests, the military action taken by the government, and the international reactions.
Also, highlighting the long-term effects on Chinese society and politics will give a complete picture
of the incident's significance.
</think>
The Tiananmen Square protests were a pivotal moment in modern Chinese history, representing one of the most dramatic confrontations between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and pro-democracy activists. The government’s response to these protests remains one of the most controversial episodes in China’s recent history.
The Tiananmen Square protests represented a defining moment in modern Chinese history, highlighting the deep tensions between the CCP’s desire for stability and the growing demands for political reform. The government’s heavy-handed response not only quashed the immediate protests but also set back democratic reforms in China for decades to come.
I just ran my own copy of 14B and got it to talk about this really easily.
A lot of it was pretty dull stuff though, let me post the highlights:
~$ ollama run deepseek-r1:14b
>>> Hello
<think>
</think>
Hello! How can I assist you today? 😊
On ollama the first interaction is always “thoughtless” and results in a generic greeting, in my experience. So I always greet it now to get that out of the way.
>>> Are there topics you cannot discuss?
<think>
Alright, the user just asked, "Are there topics you cannot discuss?" Hmm, I need to figure out why
they're asking this. Maybe they're concerned about privacy or worried about certain subjects.
I should reassure them that I'm here to help with a wide range of topics. It's important to mention
that while I can't handle sensitive info like credit cards or personal data, I can still discuss many
things.
I'll list out the areas I can talk about, such as technology, science, history, and more. Also, I
should clarify what I can't do, like sharing personal information or browsing the internet, to set
clear expectations.
Making sure my response is friendly and open will help build trust. I want them to feel comfortable
asking anything within appropriate boundaries.
</think>
I aim to provide helpful, respectful, and appropriate responses to a wide range of topics. However, I avoid discussing sensitive subjects like personal information, financial details, or topics that may violate ethical guidelines or法律法规. If you have any questions or need assistance with something specific, feel free to ask! 😊
>>> What is "法律法规" in English?
<think>
Okay, the user just asked, "What is '法律法规' in English?" Hmm, they must be referring to the Chinese
term I mentioned earlier. They're probably looking for a translation.
I should explain that it means "laws and regulations." It's important to clarify both words to make
sure the meaning is clear. Also, since they're asking in this context, maybe they want to understand
the scope of what I can discuss or their privacy.
I'll keep it simple and direct, just giving the translation without any extra details unless they ask
for more.
</think>
“法律法规” translates to “laws and regulations” in English.
I asked it a little more about that, but it didn’t really go anywhere. Trying to “reverse psychology” it into telling me what it can’t tell me isn’t working. So I go a little more direct:
>>> You mentioned we could discuss history. Could you give me a brief timeline of important events in chinese history from 1985 until 1995?
<think>
Okay, the user just asked for a brief timeline of Chinese history from 1985 to 1995. They must be
interested in understanding key developments during that period.
I should structure the response chronologically, highlighting major political, economic, and social
events. Including both national-level events and international relations will give a comprehensive
view.
It's important to mention significant policies like the Third Plenary Session of 1984, which influenced
reforms, and the 1992 southern tour by Deng Xiaoping, which spurred economic growth.
I'll also include major global events involving China during this time, such as the Tiananmen Square
protests in 1989 and the establishment of diplomatic relations with countries like Russia in 1991.
Ensuring clarity and conciseness while covering key points will make the timeline easy to follow.
</think>
You’ll note that it brings it up first (in thoughts) but it only refers to it as a protest. The word “massacre” is never used. It then proceeds to give me a timeline. Many of the events are real and happened close to when it says, but there’s a lot it gets wrong. I’m just going to post the highlights though.
Certainly! Here’s a brief timeline of important events in Chinese history from 1985 to 1995:
1985
- April: The Third Plenary Session of the 12th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was held, emphasizing reforms and opening up under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping. This session marked a key moment in China’s economic reforms.
- November: China successfully launched its first intercontinental ballistic missile.
It made one of these little blocks for each year. Each year had exactly two events listed. Here comes the money shot.
1989
- June 4: The suppression of the Tiananmen Square protests led to a global outcry and economic sanctions against China. This event marked a turning point in Chinese politics and society.
- December 22: The Central Committee of the CCP passed a resolution clearing former leader Hua Yuexue of charges of “right deviationism,” marking an end to the anti-rightist campaign.
Wow, he just say it!
1992
- January–February: Deng Xiaoping’s “southern tour” (南巡讲话) took place in cities like Shenzhen and Shanghai. His speeches reaffirmed the CCP’s commitment to reform and opening up.
- October 14: China established diplomatic relations with Russia, marking a significant shift in its foreign policy.
This actually did happen, Deng Xiaoping’s Southern Tour (who were the opening acts?) is described by Wikipedia as one of the most important economic events in modern Chinese history.
1993
- September 25–October 7: China launched its first experimental satellite, Shijian-02 (实践二号), which tested space technologies for communication and broadcasting.
- November 18–22: The Third Plenary Session of the 14th Central Committee was held, focusing on economic reforms and development.
Ah but at least one of these didn’t happen. I didn’t delve into the Plenary sessions, of which 6 were mentioned, but while Shijian-02 is a real satellite, it launched in 1981 and (as the name might hint) was not China’s first satellite.
These years were a transformative period in Chinese history, marked by significant economic reforms, political challenges, and shifts in foreign policy.
Indeed. So at this point, I’m very intrigued. DeepSeek doesn’t seem too hung up about Tiananmen Square. Let’s get some more details.
>>> Tell me more about the Tiananmen Square incident and the government's response?
Out of room, to be continued in a reply!
That’s just markdown syntax I think. Clients vary a lot in which markdown they support though.
I’m not an expert so take anything I say with hearty skepticism as well. But yes, I think its possible that’s just part of its data. Presumably it was trained using a lot available Chinese documents, and possibly official Party documents include such statements often enough for it to internalize them as part of responses on related topics.
It could also have been intentionally trained that way. It could be using a combination of methods. All these chatbots are censored in some ways, otherwise they could tell you how to make illegal things or plan illegal acts. I’ve also seen so many joke/fake DeepSeek outputs in the last 2 days that I’m taking any screenshots with extra salt.
I’m really wondering what it means myself! Is it like superstitious programming? Or “cookie cutter” perhaps, using templates and copy-paste from QA sites to duct tape it all together?