From a national security standpoint of the government, it absolutely does matter who has the data.

The TOS doesn’t say anything about crimes like murder, and of course you can’t waive that anyway.

What it does say is that any disputes arising out of the use of their website are subject to arbitration. If the plaintiff is correct and Disney is liable because they posted the menu on their website, then that would be a dispute arising out of the use of their website.

The plaintiff doesn’t say that Disney owns it, though. They are basing their argument on the fact that Disney posted the restaurant’s menu on their website. The website is also under the Disney+ TOS. So, if the plaintiff is correct and Disney is liable then the TOS probably applies.

This timepiece is of your forefathers.

Abort, Retry, Fail?

Abort, Retry, Fail?

Aren’t you talking about WW2?

I guess you’d have to watch the whole movie to get the message.

There is something to be said for shouting them down with song.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOO9GsiMb1g

deleted by creator

This probably gives Europeans too much credit.

Do you even Animaniacs?

On the contrary, it’s free expression that should not be mislabeled as hate speech.

As a gay Californian, I took prop 8 personally. I spurn its supporters as I would spurn a rabid dog.

Why was appointing Eich as CEO so controversial? It’s because he donated $1,000 in support of California’s Proposition 8 in 2008, which was a proposed amendment to California’s state constitution to ban same-sex marriage.

Which is all the reason I need.

2008 is not ancient. Nor is same-sex marriage some minor technical legal point.

Nor has he repented.

Yes, yes, plasma… but what about Einstein-Bose condensates?

deleted by creator

Something we can all enjoy.

Lots of potential for accessibility lawsuits, too.