You’d be wrong. Open source has a commonly accepted definition and a CC licensed PNG does not fall under it. It’s copyleft, yes, but not open source.
I do agree that model weights are data and can be given a license, including CC0. There might be some argument about how one can assign a license to weights derived from copyrighted works, but I won’t get into that right now. I wouldn’t call even the most liberally licensed model weights open-source though.
Oh that’s what all that meowing on the US guard frequency is about.
Easier to have ambition when you’re not using it.
I’m curious why you’d consider it a good conversation if this was the result. Clearly it wasn’t for them.
Located entirely within your kitchen.
The vegan community recommended people to move to Lemmy.ml or hexbear 🤦
Erfurt, what a shithole.
Wonder if the recent antitrust ruling about Google paying for being the default search engine will affect Mozilla’s funding.
Despite what others have mentioned, running a different LLM locally, it’s also possible to get ChatGPT to do this sort of stuff by telling it to participate in a “debate exercise” and giving it its talking points.
One rule could be censoring information that could plausibly out someone, such as the name of a (step?)family-member
That is patently false. It was developed to help develop the Linux kernel, which famously has multiple decentralized repositories managed by different maintainers.
The fact that most companies use it in a way you describe, with only one central repository, does not mean that git is not distributed.
Is that fucking loss? I stg…
Yes, great idea to report on these so the Russians know what to crack down on…
Man oh man, the UK is such a boring dystopic hole.
No no, you see, they WON, that’s why! /s
What a dumb post