Careful, you can get banned for voting “wrong” too
Lemmy shouldn’t have avatars, banners, or bios
Careful, you can get banned for voting “wrong” too
This is terrible advice
Most humans aren’t hunters at all
Dr. Jan Itor was a huge part of what made Scrubs what it is
I kept thinking “bump key” which is a tool for bypassing locks
the word literally exists in the meme in this exact post
Is it “bottom”? You slut!
Especially because they only sell Pepsi products
Yes, my experience with websites over the past few decades.
NSFW stands for “not safe for work.” What do you think it means? It’s pretty straightforward in its meaning.
It isn’t censorship if you can just turn it off and see everything. It’s a warning for people who want to browse at work but not view content that can get them in trouble
Just turn it off and ignore it if it doesn’t apply to you. The rest of us want the tag to be used for its purpose.
Which you can easily turn off if you don’t browse Lemmy at work.
Just because you don’t use the tag for its intended purpose doesn’t mean everyone doesn’t. The tag has a clear purpose, denoted by what it stands for. Most people with adult jobs understand its purpose. Don’t ruin the tag’s purpose for the rest of us by devaluing it
An NSFW tag isn’t censorship, it’s a warning for people at WORK. if you don’t use it for what it’s for, that’s not working people problems, that’s your fault.
The tag is for warning people browsing at work not to click… Using it to prevent someone from clicking on a post that would be unacceptable to read at the workplace is exactly what it’s for
It’s not like it’s censorship, it’s just a warning tag.
What do you think the tag is for?
People at work don’t (shouldn’t) click on NSFW-tagged content. If it draws your eye even more, then I assume you don’t browse from work.
How would it defeat the purpose to tag content that most workplaces would not be okay with? If you don’t mind seeing the content, then the tag might entice you. People at work will recognize it and not click
The NSFW tag is part of the mechanism to curate the feed.
I’m not sure why people get offended by people wanting to use social media but not wanting to view content that can get them fired. If the content doesn’t bother you, then you shouldn’t filter NSFW content. It’s not like the NSFW tag is censoring the content and preventing you from seeing it if you click it.
For people with jobs, why not make it easier to filter the things that companies don’t like? It doesn’t affect you any.
I know those words, but that doesn’t make any sense
I’m mostly thinking about before the days of “swipe right/swipe left” but you put in information about your personality and you got recommendations based on that.
It wasn’t so frantic or based on getting every match you could get, it was about getting matches that were most likely to click with you.
Even eHarmony was better than simply saying who was single. The entire concept of “dating apps” is good for hookups, but terrible for dating.
It definitely doesn’t work for me
That and I think the people getting breakfast that early are on a business trip rather than on vacation
There’s a few times they get racial, but it does manage to stay pretty tame about it all.
When they are showing the newscasters around the world, it certainly skirts the line, but doesn’t cross it. Much like the fellows speaking “jive”, they pull it off without turning the black men themselves into the joke.
Banned from entire communities or instances, similar to the other people in the thread who are saying that’s why they don’t comment. Some people are very sensitive about getting downvotes.