For what? Many things are legitimately a problem because of the uber rich

What? I don’t get it. What does the BBC have to do with Steam?

Hogwarts Legacy? It has great graphics, a really cool set, and fun gameplay, unfortunately the characters are morally deranged and the plot is not that great. And buying it gives money to a woman of questionable beliefs, I guess.

Content not viewable in your region.

Please use a different host to imgur (eg, Lemmy itself), that doesn’t block the UK.

Mine? Like, for mining metals?

Can someone explain the joke? I don’t remember what that thing from Lord of the Rings is

You don’t know, oh oh

checks instance

That checks out

God is not trans because he doesn’t have a physical form. He could be considered nonbinary, and he does love those neopronouns He/Him

God is not trans because he doesn’t have a physical form. He could be considered nonbinary, and he does love those neopronouns He/Him

Isn’t the red ribbon HIV/AIDS awareness?

If saying something is ‘good’ or ‘bad’ doesn’t in any way relate to what people should do, then it’s about as meaningful as saying an action is ‘zonk’ or ‘crinkey’

What would that actually mean though, for an act to be ‘intrinsically good’? I understood a good act as meaning an act that is virtuous to do, but then surely what is virtuous is determined by personal values.

Maths is objective, yes. But maths is an ‘is’, while morality is an ‘ought’. And you can’t get an ought from an is without subjective values. And while maths is objective, any individual’s understanding of it may be inaccurate.

That does sound interesting, as well as I understand it. It’s a bit complex in its language

If they exist independently of us, where could they originate? If they originate from patterns, evolutionary psychology, or a god, doesn’t it make it subjective, just to that thing, whatever it is?

Edit: nvm, I saw you replied to my other comment where I said something similar :3

UBI is a bad idea because it reinforces and relies on the capitalist idea of money. We should make basic resources themselves free, like a supermarket you can walk into and take stuff without paying, rather than giving people points to buy stuff that costs points.

It’s more like, “people before smorklank was well defined”

“Well, but smorklank exists, or it doesn’t, what do you think?”

What would it mean that it’s ‘inherently’ wrong, though? Where would the judgement come from? And if it does come from somewhere (eg evolutionary psychology, a god), doesn’t that make it just the subjective morality of that thing?

In the same way as free will, both that and subjective morality are things I have never been able to see any good definition of. And something that isn’t well defined can’t exist.