I think some of those purple ones should instead be labeled “If you can find a way to get it to stick around long enough for you to lick, you’ll win a posthumous Nobel prize.”

I was lucky that my family had a Mac when I was a kid. I did all my stupid downloading of random .exe files from sketchy sites on a machine that couldn’t run them, and by the time I got my own PC in high school, I knew a bit better.

I had my annual review last week, and they told me they base their new hire workload goals on the amount of work I do. I’m happy to do my part in bringing down expectations!

You can find them at the creator’s tumblr. They’ve since stopped making them, though.

Yeah, the cells of most animals have the ability to make their own vitamin C, very likely including our ancestors if you go back far enough. The evolutionary reason why we stopped is probably simply because our bodies stopped needing to make it due to our fruit diet, so individuals that didn’t make the acid had a little bit more energy and nutrients to spare that would’ve otherwise been wasted to make it when it’s not needed. Over millions of years that small difference was enough for them to survive to parenthood slightly more often than their peers, slowly edging them out of the gene pool.

Evolution generally pushes bodies to conserve resources, so unnecessary things are usually dropped if the environment doesn’t require them for long enough. Kinda like how creatures living in dark caves eventually evolve to stop wasting the resources to make eyes and pigmented skin.

But that was backward compatibility. The color came out first, and when the advance came out later, it was able to play the previous console’s games. The same thing will be possible with the Switch 2. The tab that the 3ds games introduced was so that you couldn’t plug the new 3ds games into the old DS, because it wouldn’t be powerful enough to play them. This would be like expecting the gameboy color to play gameboy advance games.

What are you trying to say? Yeah, you could play color games on the advance. You could also play original Gameboy games on the Gameboy color. It’s already been confirmed that you can also play Switch 1 games on the Switch 2. You could nearly always play a previous console’s games on the new console, and now is no exception. But you could never play new games that require better hardware on old consoles that aren’t strong enough. Are you saying that you expect Switch 2 games, which will make use of the more powerful switch 2 console, to work on the 8 year old hardware of the Switch 1? It’s a new generation of console, of course the new games won’t work on the old console - that’s never been a thing.

But why? It works, and it’s smart. As a kid I wondered if I could play my gameboy color games in my old gameboy. I tried putting one in, but it didn’t let me turn on the power switch because it didn’t have room for the tab that came out on the old model, and I accepted that it wouldn’t work. If it had fit and let me turn the console on, I’d have probably been a lot more confused when it didn’t work.

Good to hear!

It still exists, but was hidden for some reason. You can find it by going to the support tab and clicking the “more” button under troubleshooting information. It’ll be at the far right of the button list on the resulting screen.

Luigi’s Mansion 2 came out during the Year of Luigi, which was a pretty big deal since most people though it was never coming back. But yeah, otherwise it was pretty lame.

Oh shit, I hadn’t heard about this yet! Okami was one of those games from the early 2000’s that felt really experimental and cool, a common theme at the time, especially for PS2 games. I feel like big game companies have largely moved away from that, which is really disappointing. Even this is just another sequel, but it’s still one I’m really excited about!

“It’s-a me! Mario!”

So you agree that the vast majority of countries don’t put capital gain over human life? That legislature is possible in such a scenario, but not ours, with capital being the most important thing, lives be damned? Because that’s what I’ve been saying. Public healthcare exists when a country’s government doesn’t lie in bed with private healthcare CEOs. America’s does, and it was designed to do so. You want public healthcare? Then prepare to join the inevitable revolution, because that’s how you’ll get it.

Sure, you let me know when your method actually works. I’d love it if it did - it’d sure be a game changer literally around the world. Until then, let’s just be happy that this random gunman actually did something that worked, even if only temporarily.

Well, yes, you’re right. People will continue to do it forever. So long as accumulating capital is the goal of the country, companies like United Healthcare will exist, and will be free to ruin people’s lives in the name of gaining more capital. However, unless we literally overthrow the system, it too will never change. Currently, the only viable solution that I can see actually happen is that every few years we need to remind the CEO’s that they’re not entirely safe by culling a few. Because we literally have no other way to influence them - the law is on their side, and we would need to overthrow the law itself to change that.

Your solution is only the right one in a hypothetical world where a legislative change is possible, but we do not live in that world. We might be able to change the world to make it a viable option, but to do that would require a lot more killing of a lot more powerful people, otherwise known as a revolution. Even then, in the scenario where we tear down this system and build a new one, greed will always exist in society, and those that seek power will always eventually worm their way into powerful positions. The new system would work for a while, but when greed and power inevitably come back together again, we’ll need to tear that system down and start over once more.

A legislative solution? The people making legislature literally work with CEO’s, accepting their money in exchange for enacting policies that benefit them. They’re partners. I’d love a country where the government works for the people to hold back corporations, but this country specifically believes the opposite should be true. There will be no legislative solution insofar as capitalism is still the American system. There is no way within the current system for rich people to be brought to justice, only people working outside the system can make that happen.

Brian Thompson made a living making people blind, sometimes even literally, and it was all well within his rights in the eye of the law. Us giving him a taste of his own medicine is already showing results in those other CEO’s that don’t want to suffer the same fate. We’re literally already seeing what “an eye for an eye” gets us, and it’s fear among those who have been free to blind people for decades without ever worrying about being blinded themselves before now.

An eye for an eye doesn’t make the whole world blind. It makes a few people blind until they wise up and realize “Wait, I like making people blind, but I don’t want to be blind!” And then they stop blinding people, thus removing the need to blind them in return.

I never understood how our country - proudly founded through the uprising of the downtrodden to overthrow their oppressor with violence - could ever honestly think that violence is never the answer. Our national anthem has a stanza specifically dedicated to the rockets and bombs “we the people” used against the British.

Which is part of the problem. This whole expectation that our leaders should hide their true feelings and motivations behind a veil of niceties only serves their goals of hiding such things from the people trying to figure out who to vote for. We should know who our politicians are as actual people, since it’s the person they are in private that will motivate their actions within the government, not the nice face they put on for the public.