Jimmy cracked corn and i dont care.

I thought i deleted facebook

Then whose light is it?

God fucking damn it

How dare you basically support the opposite side of my opinions by suggesting my posts arent changing the world and eliminating facism from the comfort of my home.

Minesweeper 16

Any energy spent trying to generalize some already poorly defined mass of people is wasted energy.

k

Lol not hard.

Lol wtf

Its poking fun at the fact that nvidia is heavily pushing ai generated frame and upscaling to give better performance but many people hate this because it makes reaction times muddy and other artifacting things, and that the poor improvement of performance from the 4000 series cards is being dowbplayed (esepcially for how much they are charging for these cards)

This image is a stock chart of them going down, and the poster is joking that its performance is not as bad as it looks if you use their upscaling technology.

The depreciation in their stock is related to ai valuation dipping down across the indistry china released a free ai chatbot that rivals openai quality at a fraction of the cost and without needing nvidia gpus, leaving investors maybe wondering what all of this money is for, and if huge ai related companies will just be undercut by smaller organizations.

As ai companies move towards making ai agents specialized at certain tasks, we will soon see if huge companies like openai and nvidia will show us why they are worth their current valuations. The time is coming to see some results from the research and development of these companies. They cant just say they have the most important tech in their hands if they dont convert it to value. I think some really cool stuff will come out and i think this anxiety should drive them to compete more. I like this.

Idk that kind of sounds like getting rid of circles from society to stop people from driving their cars.

Its a matter of “how much time can each employee spend on one task/project”

Crowdsourcing decision-making can be a good way to make decisions. But complex, time-sensitive, specialized problems need to be handled with many hours of expertise in many different fields like data analytics (essentially predicting the future). Maybe the more specialization thats required, the less laymen input is effective in contributing. People spend their lives interpreting data, and can make fast data-driven decisions that produce the results. From theres it all Game Theory between organizations and its not that crazy that they refuse to concede the competitive edge and let someone else dominate the market. It seems like it would be hard to enforce not making certain decisions data driven.

Getting input from employees that are understanding of the subtleties is probably appreciated but even experts can be unfamiliar with the cadence of the project schedule which is why Change Control is a thing to ensure changes are not delaying or raising costs, or work the changes in with minimal distruption.

If “bosses” arent doing their job then they wont be able to explain to their bosses whats going on for them to make decisions effectively. People at the top dont like incompetency even if they themselves are. Yes bad decisions can come from the top and power corrupts.

I think its clear our government has failed us on many levels but i think banning the abstract structure “hierarchy” is some weak meme shit.

Hierarchies are not inherently good or bad.

They help where they help and they oppress where they oppress.

Idk how that applies to every organization. It sounds pretty specific.

Because were talking about getting rid of all hierarchies right?

And if decisions are at rhe lowest possible levels then it seems like thats a hierarchy, which is more horizontal rather than not being a hierarchy.

Also i dont understand what “everything being voluntary” means and if that applies to all organizations or just government or what.

And i dont know what you meam by “the position” or “temporal” or “at the start” and that it “changes everything”.

If the goal of society is to put equality above all else then i take your point.

I think horizontal hierarchies are generally better in an organization in terms of motivating people to contribute and give them a sense of equity.

But idk how you avoid the fact that people do have bad ideas, or well intentioned ideas that could start a cascade of delays in project planning for example. People focusing on the excellence at different levels of work is important right? But having a chain of command to maintain vision, timelines, budgets, stakeholders seems to depend on hierarchy.

Hierarchies seem like an important structure to have in society.

So if youll join me down disinformation avenue, do you think these are largely real people? I only ask because every time i find myself turning back to corporate social media its because the high polarization of all topics by people like that on lemmy.

It seems like a good deterrent to the adoption of FOSS social media if someone were to employ ai to do so, but i can also believe that the first people to transition to FOSS would be highly radicalized people.

So they are people who want to violently or otherwise enforce their ideal view of some flavor of communism on the rest of the world? And they try to realize this by organizing and radicalizing people on social media?

Hey whats a tankie

You can ignore the sign jesus christ