• 0 Posts
  • 48 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 24th, 2023

help-circle



  • If it’s a L2 system the driver is always liable. The report just makes sure we know it’s happening and can force changes if patterns are found. The NHSTA made Tesla improve their driver monitoring based off the data since that was the main problem. The majority of accidents (almost all) were drunk or distracted drivers.

    If it’s a L4 system Tesla is always liable, we’ll see that in June in Austin in theory for the first time on public roads.

    The report never changes liability, it just let’s us know what the state of the vehicle was for the incident. Tesla can’t say the system was off because it was off 1 second before because we’ll know it was on prior to that. But that doesn’t change liability.


  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldThe Tesla Trolley
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It turns off, but it’s likely so the AEB system can kick in.

    AP and AEB are separate things.

    Also all L2 crashes that involve an air bag deployment or fatality get reported if it was on within something like 30s before hand, assuming the OEM has the data to report, which Tesla does.

    Rules are changing to lessen when it needs to be reported, so things like fender benders aren’t necessarily going to be reported for L2 systems in the near future, but something like this would still be and alway has.






  • What’s even wilder: it was Rick Astley’s first solo hit. He had done duets and sang on other people’s tracks, but that was his first single from his debut studio album. And it went straight to the fucking moon.

    That is wild, had no idea. Was he well known as a non solo singer at the time with lot of anticipation of his first solo?



  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldThe Cybertruck
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think it was targeted at the accelerator pedal.

    The pedal cover was designed to be attached with industrial adhesives, but when it got to the production line, they were having trouble installing it and some production line manager/workers decided to add some soap to it/the process to get it to slide on better.

    This ruined the adhesives and the pedal on some vehicles it slipped off, potentially keeping it stuck down if it wedged itself right, triggering a recall where they riveted it on.

    INB4: OMG ADHESIVES? Yes, industrial adhesives can be very strong and are already used all over cars. You just don’t put soap on them… SMH









  • I think you’re mixing up cases and agencies?

    Tesla sued the Swedish Transport Agency (STA) AND PostNord.

    The ruling against the STA is to allow them to pick up the plates at the STA instead of the STA via their exclusivity contract giving them to PostNord. It has nothing to do with PostNord as it lets Tesla go to the STA directly. The STA is appealing this interim decision.

    There is no ruling with PostNord yet, the judge gave them 3 days to give an initial argument to decide if he would even make an interim ruling prior to the full case being heard. I imagine Tesla is going to have a really hard time with the PostNord case.