Lols [they/them]

thats bad, but still not as bad as the government responding with mandates on what women are or are not allowed to wear, nor is this an answer to the problem

like, how do you reckon this is going to pan out? you reckon women who actually are coerced into covering up are going to take it off when they go to public buildings (including schools), or do you reckon the men in their life just wont let them go to public buildings (including schools) anymore?

the right either has not thought about this law or is completely disingenuous about why they support it

no

im aware that it was largely a rich few that were actually responsible for these acts, im arguing that responsibility isnt all that relevant

it shouldnt be about chastising or punishing, it should be about getting folks who continue to have an advantage from horrendous acts to help out folks who continue to have a disadvantage resulting from those horrendous acts in order to level the playing field, because thats the right thing to do

in theory a lot or europeans are still living comfortably off of the horrific crimes they committed, and african and caribbean nations are still struggling and at a massive disadvantage compared to where they could have been

in practice i doubt this money would come from those most responsible, and i doubt the money would go to those with the biggest disadvantages

i also dislike reparations in general compared to help for the sake of help, as it draws focus away from whether nations actually need help and how much, and instead operates entirely on a blame game

not that help for the sake of it is going to happen sufficiently either anyway

deleted by creator

what are the real world, practical examples of putting 5% into something you think likely won’t work, and what are the real world, practical examples of putting 100% into something you think likely will work?

life rarely if ever asks you for a complete political ideology, the vast majority of the time your influence on the world will be limited to specific answers to specific issues

i think youre commenting on the wrong post, ‘not being able to oppress people’ isnt featured in this one

this one actually specifically features religious oppression getting approved as law

luckily for those dipshit cultists whoops sorry, ‘muslim women whose safety we care about very much’, getting forced to go against their fundamentalist families or bite continuous fines is very safe, and will turn out very well for them

but presumably you do see the severeral photos of protestors, including men, in the capital of iran regardless of what other pictures might also be on the page

…so as i was saying, i am glad we are fighting women being forced to dress themselves a certain way by forcing them to dress themselves a certain way

not even trying to mask that this law is literally just about bullying muslims lol

no dont worry, its only the brown people face coverings that are bad

https://www.cfr.org/article/photos-iran-mahsa-amini-protest-uprising-women

is this a joke or

i am glad that we are fighting these terrible regimes that enforce what women can and cannot wear by letting the regime enforce what women can and cannot wear

high five gang

if you give up on solving that issue with anything other than fossil fuels, yes

deleted by creator

how does it applying to both sides make it not work?

yall act like you can either be fine with religious riots or be fine with inciting religious riots

can you be more clear about what youre saying, I don’t get it

iirc burning flags of other nations is also not ok

Governments consist of different people, different branches of government have different average views, someones views on immigration are not necessarily indicative of their views on hate speech and muslims do actually live in denmark

id rather international politics be based on whats beneficial as opposed to whatll punish people best