To be fair, one can have good reasons against .ml as well as .world

Having two communities is not the worst idea imho

I like the word swaticar, quite fitting. But I would never use the word swatiscar Its mean

I kinda do, that’s why I wrote, but no hard feelings :)

Most communists/socialists arent tankies (even if .ml tries really hard to convince everyone otherwise) but identify with hammer and sickle too :(

But fk tankies, I’m with you on that

Was sending it before I saw the comment is expandable, read the second paragraph, deleted 30sec after posting. How did you all read it and replied?

You guys must be fucking fast xD

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Both, both is good

I would argue x is worse.

The function of no social media is to show you content. It once was to generate revenue, but recently x and meta have become the same propaganda machines as tiktok, just owned by different megalomaniac fanatics

God I feel like some people really are like this and wonder why they don’t have any friends who are actually decent people.

Clipboard empty :(

deleted by creator

Tell me in the correct scientific terms why the two Party system in america is a democracy

Architechtects

Motionless in white (especially the last Album)

Ah okay, then i just didnt get the joke XD (propably because i find Worcestershire sauce quite easy to pronounce and couldnt find no connection of the second two with the first one) thanks for explaining though

Non native here understanding non of the above xD

American with two Party system and no real choice trying ro rationalize HM?

Okay, I think we have different definitions of socialism. In my book that’s a fair society where everyone gets the stuff he needs and gives the stuff he can. Can’t really make this work fairly with racism and sexism can you?

Sure you can change the political system (from unbound parliament to bound council) but that not a society changed from capitalism to socialism.

But I think this is a question of definition, more important is the question of “can you have capitalism without discrimination” and I really don’t think so. You need the army of unemployed so your system doesn’t collapse and you can’t have an army of unemployed if you don’t have some reason why they should suffer.

Also capitalism literally works in the way, that you get played as low as possible, so discriminating people to pay them less is so encouraged by the system, that it is practically build into the system .

On everything you said after that: “amen”!

Okay okay okay. You talk about class inequality but say you like capitalism? What classes are you talking about?