When I see a little girl getting excited about Disney princesses and wanting to be one, I see a child being sexually groomed. It’s disgusting and it needs to stop. It’s abusive. We shouldn’t be exposing children to these kinds of messaging. We need to be aware of what our words mean, so we can use them wisely.

Yes, but it would be mean to them.

https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/princesses-are-nsfw-f9e6c3d4532d

Least sexually abusive She-Ra fan

Here’s the second: https://aussie.zone/post/16690613/14097514

Well I wouldn’t call the article itself a work of science, but it explains the science behind this meme, and I was sure nobody would understand the meme if I didn’t include it.

*You

Another technology that uses the subjectivity of reality is film. If we always perceived the objective truth, we couldn’t watch Star Wars and see a Jedi. Instead, we’d just see coloured lights on a screen. Our minds are able to construct a subjective reality using a very small amount of stimuli, and create the subjective experience of another whole universe. (Or galaxy far far away, at least).

Here, have some better philosophical discourse:

The belief that reality is objective holds us back from discovering technologies that exploit the subjectivity of reality. Therefore the practical choice with regards to solipsism/realism is anti-realism

Children should never be encouraged to play with princesses. https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/princesses-are-nsfw-f9e6c3d4532d

https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/the-commodification-of-myth-2e0e68b7f1ec

You’re not alone. The antirealist community says lots of things like this.

https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/so-you-found-out-youre-agender-because-you-don-t-understand-trans-people-886fdee6f178

This makes perfect sense. Princess is, after all, a very dirty word. https://scribe.rip/@viridiangrail/princesses-are-nsfw-f9e6c3d4532d

This reality is a simulation. But it’s not electronic like the Matrix, it’s social. You’ve been socially conditioned to see what the owning class want you to see.

http://soulism.net/

I think it’s very simple. If you spend all day thinking about gay dick, your body is going to react. Normally only gay mascs and horny women spend all day thinking about gay dick. Straight men don’t have a reaction to gay dick because they don’t condition that response. They don’t think about gay dick for long enough for Pavlov to kick in. Homophobes condition themselves by constantly thinking about sex (hot; unconditioned stimulus) and gay (conditioned stimulus) at the same time. If they just quit thinking about gay sex all day, their fetish would go away. But that would require being less homophobic, and they can’t. Then they get worried that they’re gay, because they like dick, so they assume being gay is what they have. And since what they have sucks, they assume being gay sucks, which makes them more homophobic.

A similar thing happens in POCD, or Pedophile Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. The fear of being a pedophile conditions an association between children and arousal, which self-reinforces in a vicious cycle. Fortunately, most people with POCD are not fascists, so they’re capable of having a normal response to it in which they don’t proceed to deliberately indulge in the association. In order for someone to be homophobic and suffer the same thing with gay thoughts, their judgement has to already be compromised, which produces a more toxic reaction.

https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/the-link-between-homophobia-and-being-gay-youve-got-it-the-wrong-way-round-07d4b017d2ec

https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/the-realist-hatred-of-fun-80565cf369f6

Disrespectability politics!

https://medium.com/@viridiangrail/introducing-disrespectability-politics-50f6e2622ce4

Soulist lemur

The angels are scared of the Excrucians, and they should be.