Well yeah they are public? Lemmy is indexed by Google. I imagine everything on here is as well.

Pigs are pretty much proof of god. There’s no way nature could create such a ludicrously delicious animal. Every fucking part of it is just gorgeous.

Don’t license it as free to use then.

There were a good few game shows with that theme.

I’ve noticed with my kids it’s more about streamers. They all know them by name. They’ll talk about their latest videos like we would with TV show episodes.

Many shows when we were kids were just drivers for toy sales though. Product placement was also huge and unregulated.

I’m sure it was very common. But that’s whataboutism and it’s definitely worth noting.

He enslaved people as he travelled

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/12/us/christopher-columbus-slavery-disease-trnd/index.html

No it’s not. It’s pedantic and arguing semantics. It is essentially useless and a waste of everyone’s time.

It applies a statistical model and returns an analysis.

I’ve never heard anyone argue when you say they used a computer to analyse it.

It’s just the same AI bad bullshit and it’s tiring in every single thread about them.

I literally quoted the word for that exact reason. It just gets really tiring when you talk about AIs and someone always has to make this point. We all know they don’t think or understand in the same way we do. No one gains anything by it being pointed out constantly.

I mean they literally do analyze text. They’re great at it. Give it some text and it will analyze it really well. I do it with code at work all the time.

Because they are two completely different tasks. Asking them to recall information from their training is a very bad use. Asking them to analyze information passed into them is what they are great at.

Give it a sample of code and it will very accurately analyse and explain it. Ask it to generate code and the results are wildly varied in accuracy.

I’m not assuming anything you can literally go and use one right now and see.

One of LLMs main strengths over traditional text analysis tools is the ability to “understand” context.

They are bad at generating factual responses. They are amazing at analysing text.

Got to practise firing cannons mate

Exactly. Look at the state of it. We definitely should have taken that.

In fairness it likely wouldn’t be preserved otherwise. So you’re welcome.

Baking is the best place to start. You often just measure your ingredients precisely and then mix them for simple recipes.

None of this “a pinch of” bullshit. How many grams in a pinch you vague fuck!?!

There’s loads of options.

Plenty of science that could potentially save us if invested properly.

Lab grown meat. Carbon capture. Using said carbon capture for building materials. Nuclear fusion. Outer atmosphere energy generation. Etc.

There’s also cutting back on our consumerism.

Once it gets bad enough that it affects the super rich the world’s governments will miraculously and quickly act as one.

Yeah because they don’t make stuff up. They just have a huge bias.

That site seems heavily right biased and not very factual. What’s your point?

Women are so cute and I have a good day at work