A ton of Americans would take the job if it only involved shooting. Thing is though, it’ll also involve being shot at.

Man, I’m shocked that most people would rather wear a duck costume in sweltering heat than risk taking a bullet or a grenade!

• Someone makes meme
• People like it and join in
• Brand sees attention and wants to be ‘hip’
• Brand co-opts meme and draws in other brands
• Meme is no longer cool, now it’s just brand memeing at brand

deleted by creator

Well I mean, if these communities make you uncomfortable then you should definitely block ‘em.

I meant the comments.

Sounds like most people on the internet; just shitting opinions out into the open internet and completely unwilling to accept that people might have their own opinions on your opinions.

…dude what the fuck did I read LOL

I’m sorry but the whole thread is invisible aside from one message. Might wanna use something else.

Dunno about evangelical atheists, but Lemmy is full of tankies.

Well, he’s a misunderstood figure in the comics itself. Kinda fitting that a lot of people IRL misunderstand him as well.

It’s actually rather fitting imo that Batman is so misunderstood.

In that case, maybe you should’ve replied to the post itself to argue that ‘men who hate women’ can’t possibly define the movement, rather than this long defense of feminism and how only the majority of the movement can define it (which isn’t entirely true either)

Misandrist feminists couldn’t be more on-topic if they tried, since it’s their actions that provide the vast majority of the fuel for feminism’s perception as a misandrist movement. They, as members of the movement, define it far more than external factors like ‘men who hate women’.

People like OP remind me that there are, indeed, those who think Batman is worse than people with genocidal tendencies just because his daddy was rich.

Again, this whole thread was about the image of the movement, and the culpability of misandrist feminists in painting an image of feminists as ‘women who hate men’. In this particular thread, the ‘image of the movement’ is literally the core topic of discussion.

Look, you go ahead and keep on pretending that the feminist movement is perfect and that all the bigots are ‘not true feminists’. Keep acting like feminism is only all the good things, and it wasn’t feminists who had battered men’s shelters shut down, that TERFs aren’t ‘real feminists’. Keep pretending that anyone who criticizes feminism is actually just ‘anti-feminism’. In the end, it won’t change what the image of the movement is, nor will it change the people behind that image.

TERF isn’t a self-identification label though, it was given to them.

Again, this whole thread was about the image of the movement, and the culpability of misandrist feminists in painting an image of feminists as ‘women who hate men’.

Except the DPRK is a self-given name of an out-and-out fascist country, not a name given to it by other democracies for still standing by the essentials of democratic republics. This is unlike TERFs, where they’re still considered feminists (hence the name) since they still stand by the essentials of the movement (ie more rights for women).