Quak, Quak, quuaakk

  • 0 Posts
  • 65 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: December 23rd, 2023

help-circle











  • Here’s why not: Because too much vacancies/transient inhabitants destroys communities.

    A lot of shops etc depend on local customers. If there is too small a consumer base, these shops disappear starting a cycle that is detrimental to the neighborhood.

    This separated from the assholes that drag their airport suitcases with hard plastic wheels across the pavement at all hours. Have weekday keg parties and all sorts of other shenanigans. Neighborhoods are for living, hotels and other accomodations are permitted for a reason.

    The way it all started was people with a spare bedroom, which is fine. Then the residents will make sure that people behave and that the airBnB’ers behave.



  • It also heavily depends on the type of tourism.

    Amsterdam had cruise ships come there, dump tourists that would swarm the city and return to the ship for lunch/dinner. The tourists added almost nothing to the cities economy, while the city did have to deal with them.

    Off course other towns and cities benefit, but the question is should a city accomodate it all, should there be a limit and how to enforce the limit.

    But I can see that with the industrialization of everything, industrialised tourism is annoying.