I’m not a lawyer, but I know they can put enough leins on a property to take possession of it. I’m pretty sure police will also forcefully remove someone who’s violating civil trespassing laws, but again, not a lawyer.

Local ordinances can also make things like camping on private property illegal. That would be at the city level, but really an HOA is just another form of local government so I’d argue that counts too.

Local ordinances and HOA CC&Rs can make it illegal to live on your own land unless you meet certain requirements, like having a specific type of permanent building (eg. no manufactured homes).

Now that’s jive

People who were/are upset about singular they really don’t understand that language change is pervasive and unstoppable.

What do you mean by this, exactly? As someone who is deeply “engrained” (?) in the field of linguistics, surely you must be aware that singular “they” has been in usage since the 14th century.

It’s a Linux joke though

I don’t know what, if any, CS background you have, but that is way off. The training dataset is used to generate the weights, or the trained model. In the context of building a trained LLM model, the input is the dataset and the output is the trained model, or weights.

It’s more appropriate to call deepseek “open-weight” rather than open-source.

I used the word “source” a couple times in that post… The first time was in a general sense, as an input to generate an output. The training data is the source, the model is the “function” (using the mathematics definition here, NOT the computer science definition!), and the weights are the output. The second use was “source code.”

Weights can be changed just like a compiled binary can be changed. Closed source software can be modified without having access to the source code.

The weights aren’t the source, they’re the output. Modifying the weights is analogous to editing a compiled binary, and the training dataset is analogous to source code.

I’m happy to question my own biases, but only when the other party is willing to act in good faith. You clearly aren’t. I checked, and none of your other posts in this thread cite sources that disprove what I’ve said.

Oops, I didn’t realize I was posting on ML. That’s my bad, I should have expected this bias.

For the record, I don’t see any evidence or sources in your responses to me.

Have nice day.

I understand the subject well enough to know you can’t back up your claims with evidence. You clearly have an agenda here…

“It’s possible, you just have to train your own model.”

Which is almost as much work as you would have to do if you were to start from scratch.

That doesn’t mean it’s straightforward, or even possible, to entirely remove the censorship that’s baked into the model.

I could see them claiming injury if they got caught. But in this role play, it sounds like the “cop” was getting away with it, and started shouting for no reason.

A cop yelling “officer down!” while having sex with a suspect doesn’t seem very realistic to me.

Pretty sure you were looking for psychological

Seems realistic. Thanks for the details.

Curious how you calculated that? What system load is it based on? Idle? Max?

Of course they would, Firefox is a huge project. But that doesn’t mean Mozilla is the only organization that can manage it.