I’ve looked online to see whether other people had this bug and couldn’t find anything.

I didn’t realise it was as specific as you say, I might look at using a different account for browsing feddit.uk which feels kind of ironic

There’s nothing more fun than travelling with someone you like, but if someone forces you to move somewhere you feel uncomfortable… That’s no good!

if you don’t want to or can’t use extensions, just right click > inspect on the password field, then right click the element highlighted in the HTML and click “use in console” or “store in global variable” depending on browser

it’ll put something like

temp0 into the console

just change that line to

temp0.value = "yourpassword"
```  and press enter

it sounds verbose to explain but it's just a couple of clicks and one command, if you're using a password manager it's still a lot easier than typing out a random string and it should work with most text boxes and inputs, might not work if the page is doing something fancy.

Why is your comment so adversarial when previous commenter literally said they weren’t sure?

That’s not the same as dismissing women’s accounts so please don’t equate them

I once travelled away from the Greenwich Meridian, that was West of Time

People using technology on the internet?

What’s the world coming to…

One of the big things they taught us in history lessons was how he came across very charismatic and that he was good at winning people over.

It’s really important for people to understand and learn in order to not repeat the mistakes of populism, evil people don’t generally go around shouting about how evil they are.

Also by destroying half of all life, presumably that includes animals and plants (and therefore food resources).

Doesn’t really seem like it solved anything at all

Elimitary, my dear Watson

Which UK party are you referring to as being pro-Moscow?

Homo means same, and phile means phile.

And that concludes our intensive three week course

"It’s time to conquer all of India…

… just most of India"

No, some podcasts still have sponsors embedded in the content but that’s not Spotify themselves.

Which entire country? This is lemmy.world

Polls show independence was briefly in the lead for a few months of 2020, but has remained consistently behind otherwise since 2014

“We don’t need no stinking E”

~ Homer Earl Bill Simpson

Not to be confused with a “Torquay Teary” when your family trip to Cornwall goes badly

I had similar, my Bluetooth headphones that I’d been using with the PS3 didn’t work on my PS4, but I think the reason given was that they didn’t support Bluetooth encryption standards or something.

Like bro, I do not care if someone eavesdrops the audio of my Kingdom Hearts session - just give me the choice

No

You say it’s not immeasurable but then all of the things you go on to describe are within the known universe, we can’t possibly know or measure what’s outside of it, because it is not known by definition.

I’m not asking for negative proofs in fact I haven’t asked for proof of anything, I’m not sure where you got that from. I’ve simply stated that we can’t draw statistics about things for which we have no evidence - which you now seem to be agreeing with.

I said you were making a different argument because you originally talked about existing religions which isn’t what my comment or the original comment was about, I stand by that - nothing of what you had said was relevant to my response.

You can’t possibly know that it’s over 99% unlikely that the universe isn’t a simulation or that it wasn’t created by some entity since we don’t yet have evidence pertaining to any hypothesis for how it was created. The statistic was pulled out of the air and has no scientific basis.

Do I think the universe is a giant Boltzmann brain or was created by an omniscient God? No, I don’t, but it’s still pointless to pretend it’s something we can have any certainty about.

Not to be rude but this conversation isn’t going anywhere, whether you don’t understand or just don’t agree, whatever I guess…

I understand your point and I feel like maybe I’m sounding a little argumentative. Sorry let me try to be more clear.

I understand your argument is that genetic evidence disproves existing religious beliefs that people have but that’s a different argument to the point I was making.

Even if all global religions are incorrect, that doesn’t mean that a god or gods couldn’t hypothetically exist and my point is that there is no demonstrative proof of that either way.

If you check the original comment again, the question was about whether “a god(s) exist” and up until they mentioned the 99% that I was disputing, religion didn’t even come into it.

You could disprove every creationist claim, every anti-evolution argument, and you’d be right, but you can’t settle the question of “whether a supernatural being exists” because there simply isn’t a way to do that within the natural realm that we know of.

It isn’t just about God either. The simulation and Boltzmann brain hypotheses are similarly immeasurable