• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle








  • given that:

    lately the buzzwords “techno-anarchism”, “solarpunk”, “trans-humanism” and “urbanism” have been ricocheting around my mind

    and the book recs; have you read Daemon, by Daniel Suarez? because that book (and the sequel Freedom™) match exactly those tags! ;)

    (well…plus a bit good bot of Cyberpunk, which i’m guessing you don’t mind)


  • 9bananas@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneruler
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    there’s evidence of his views going waaay back, they just rarely reached the mainstream…and now it’s just obvious, so there’s a lot of people genuinely surprised because he used to at least thinly veil his awful views.

    but it was always there…


  • …okay? that wasn’t the question being asked. did you get confused at some point?

    like, i agree with what you said, just…what does it have to do with the current state of affairs?

    the entire comment chain talks about the past and how capitalism has (supposedly) improved conditions. (since that “improvement” is implied to have already happened by the past tense, we’re talking about the current system. without specifying anything about exactly “who” those conditions have improved for…conveniently)

    so i fail to see the connection to (largely) theoretical improvements to capitalism…


  • 9bananas@lemmy.worldtoFediverse memes@feddit.ukWelcome ex-Redditors!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    i mean…yeah? kinda? on a technicality?

    Developers that use our General Public Licenses protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software.

    you assert the first part as fact and then kinda skip over the second part…at least that’s how i read your comment.

    yes, the copyright owner (the creator) “owns” the work…but then immediately uses said ownership to explicitly allow everyone else to do just about anything with it, short of claiming it as one’s own creation.

    you are the best kind of correct, but only that kind.



  • 9bananas@lemmy.worldtoFediverse memes@feddit.ukWelcome ex-Redditors!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    there’s no contradiction, because the developer does not matter. that’s the entire point of FOSS.

    it could be written by a literal nazi (not that there’s a big difference between brown and red fascists) and it wouldn’t matter one bit.

    that’s the entire beauty of FOSS!

    we ALL own the code.

    if Dessalines ever stops developing it, anyone can take over.

    if Dessalines implements code the community at large doesn’t like, anyone can create a fork and change that specific part and continue from there.

    we can see exactly what the code does, and can create new versions at any point.

    that was always the reason behind decentralized, open source networks:

    nobody can own it.