• zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Joplin user here. What does obsidian have that I might want? I remember briefly trying it years ago and disliking it.

    • Midnight1938@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Write 4000 notes

      Get a new device

      Sync

      Die waiting

      I do miss joplin, but not cuz it looked good or cuz it was good at syncing

      • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Looks like Obsidian’s sync is $8/mo and is a bit messy to sync otherwise, if sharing between Android and Windows. Not a fan of that at all. Joplin sync just works.

  • tuckerm@supermeter.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Obsidian is great; I was a happy user for a couple years. But I recently switched to Logseq and I think I’m already liking it more, and it’s because of something Logseq doesn’t do.

    Obsidian lets you write a full markdown file, so step one is deciding how to write something down. Is it a nested list? Or a table? Or headings and subheadings with paragraphs?

    In Logseq, everything is a nested list. This feels like a limitation, but I’ve been preferring it. The decision is made for you: you’re going to jot this information down as a list. So then you just start writing it.

    People often tout that Logseq is open source, and while that is great, IMO there is also a design consideration that makes it better. Pretty much any kind of information you want to write down can be represented as a nested list. Doing it that way keeps everything simple, consistent, and more searchable. (Logseq’s built-in querying feature seems to be more powerful than Obsidian’s Dataview plugin, although I can’t say much about it since I haven’t really played with it yet.)

    Both Obsidian and Logseq save (kinda) standard markdown files, so if you spend a lot of time in a plain text editor, you can still use that. You don’t lose anything by editing a file in a separate editor – they will both parse and re-index the file next time you view it in the respective app.

      • boatswain@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        CherryTree is way clunkier, IMO, and has too many irrelevant options that get in the way, particularly around formatting. Obsidian is just markdown, so you don’t have the option of spending 15 minutes trying to figure out why code blocks are showing up as dark text on light background even though you’re in dark mode, which was my last experience in CherryTree. Looking and cross referencing documents is also super easy; I’m not sure if CherryTree even does that.

  • Space Sloth@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tried it, felt it was too limited with just markdown. Feature wise i prefer Notion, but i don’t like it’s ongoing feature creep with AI implementation or it’s pricing model.

    So if there’s any note taking apps out there with a database page type or proper tables, do let me know.