Remember, the social Democrats sided with the Nazis over the socialists. They’ve done it every time they’ve been given the opportunity, and will continue to do so as many times as people fall for their shtick.

“The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house."
-Audre Lorde

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How equality does society need to be controlled in a ‘true democracy’? Completely equally? I’d rather have competent people controlling more of it than incompetent people.

    • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tfOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What are you even advocating for here? You seem hung up on some weird definition you have in your brain, and ignore what I said.

      If it’s controlled by a small group of people, while there is a larger group of people who a disaffected and incapable of direct participation in governance, then it’s not a Democracy, as simple as that.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m trying to nail down what democracy is, because you seem to be excluding ownership by your definition. If you use that definition, I can’t argue with you, since we’re talking about different democracies.

        I think a democracy is a government that does the will of the people as much as practical. (No constant mind reading etc) (But we also can’t have total democracy because of the tyranny of the majority.) It seems like you’re defining it more broadly.

        I think well regulated economies are an effective way of giving greater control to component people in order to effectively do what people want. I don’t think economies invariably must lead to a small group of people in control of the government to the exclusion of everyone else.