Webb, an investigative journalist for the San Jose Mercury News, uncovered convincing evidence that proceeds from international cocaine trafficking represented a major source of funding for US-backed right-wing death squads in Nicaragua (known as the Contras) with South Central Los Angeles and other urban African American communities serving as key markets for the drug; and more distressing, that the CIA had become aware of this illicit commerce early on and incorporated it into a broader domestic strategy, allowing the cocaine pipeline to continue and thrive to a massive degree that eventually gave rise to the U.S. “crack epidemic” of the '80s and '90s and the birth of the prison-industrial sector.
Webb DID NOT break the story of America’s crack coming from the Contras with the CIA’s approval. That fact had already been available around the time it occurred. Webb’s contribution was gathering and sharing the details and more evidence. To be fair, Webb never claimed to have any evidence that the CIA engineered the whole thing, only that they knew it was going on, approved of it, and even met with Contra leaders and funders to discuss it.
Webb’s downfall as a journalist is mainly due to his making unsupported claims. If he had had evidence for all of his claims, it would not have made him vulnerable to being discredited. For example, the US Justice Department found that “the allegations contained in the original Mercury News articles were exaggerations of the actual facts,” and that “the claims that Blandón and Meneses were responsible for introducing crack cocaine into South Central Los Angeles and spreading the crack epidemic throughout the country were unsupported.” Even Nick Schou, Webb’s biographer, agreed that, “the story offered no evidence to support such sweeping conclusions, a fatal error that would ultimately destroy Webb, if not his editors.”
On December 10, 2004, Gary Webb took his own life. It is true that there were two bullet wounds in his head, which has raised suspicions that his death might not have been a suicide. However, no evidence has yet been presented contradicting the coroner’s findings, so we have to accept it as such for now.
And yes, Kill the Messenger (2014) is worth watching. It is a surprisingly accurate film starring Jeremy Renner. It portrays how Webb assembled the story and depicts the media’s tomfoolery and its impact on Webb’s life. Even Webb’s own son liked it.
On December 10, 2004, Gary Webb took his own life. It is true that there were two bullet wounds in his head, which has raised suspicions that his death might not have been a suicide. However, no evidence has yet been presented contradicting the coroner’s findings, so we have to accept it as such for now.
I fundamentally disagree with the premise of this statement and you should also.
“What we are being told happened here is completely impossible, but no one has presented anything more plausible, so we must accept this as truth and move on.”
Absolutely not. Bullshit. Fuck that. You should be ashamed of yourself for even writing that in public. You’re being lied to, right to your face, boldly and unashamedly, to rug-sweep a set of extremely illegal governmental actions without any sort of culpability - and your response to this is “Well, better not worry about that then!”
How could you possibly think that’s the correct response to that?
Bit late to do something about it now, we missed that bus, but I can draw a straight line from Ronald Reagan to Contra to this to the fascist hellhole of an American society that find ourselves in in the current day. If anyone had held their government responsible for anything it has done at any point in time, we might have shifted that path just a little.
Bullseye. Anyone swallowing the official story about Webb is naive at best. I mean what the fuck “It’s impossible so we must accept it as truth?”, again what the actual fuck? How does someone think like this?
The proof we do have is that Webb became extremely depressed because of all the media slander, his loss of credibility as a journalist from his peers and the general population and ultimately, the resignation from his position, inability to find a job, and loss of his mortgage and house a week prior to his death.
What we have zero proof of is why the CIA would want to kill someone that didn’t break the significant story in the first place, was already widely discredited and shunned, and EIGHT years after the news had died down.
Also, it is not impossible to have a suicide with two bullets. It happens rarely when the first shot fails to be immediately lethal. Considering the first bullet went through his left cheek, it probably didn’t kill him. It was the second shot that hit an artery.
On top of that, Webb’s own family firmly believe it was a suicide and they would appreciate it if you would treat it as such as they knew him a lot more than you did.
Important clarification:
Webb, an investigative journalist for the San Jose Mercury News, uncovered convincing evidence that proceeds from international cocaine trafficking represented a major source of funding for US-backed right-wing death squads in Nicaragua (known as the Contras) with South Central Los Angeles and other urban African American communities serving as key markets for the drug; and more distressing, that the CIA had become aware of this illicit commerce early on and incorporated it into a broader domestic strategy, allowing the cocaine pipeline to continue and thrive to a massive degree that eventually gave rise to the U.S. “crack epidemic” of the '80s and '90s and the birth of the prison-industrial sector.
Webb DID NOT break the story of America’s crack coming from the Contras with the CIA’s approval. That fact had already been available around the time it occurred. Webb’s contribution was gathering and sharing the details and more evidence. To be fair, Webb never claimed to have any evidence that the CIA engineered the whole thing, only that they knew it was going on, approved of it, and even met with Contra leaders and funders to discuss it.
Webb’s downfall as a journalist is mainly due to his making unsupported claims. If he had had evidence for all of his claims, it would not have made him vulnerable to being discredited. For example, the US Justice Department found that “the allegations contained in the original Mercury News articles were exaggerations of the actual facts,” and that “the claims that Blandón and Meneses were responsible for introducing crack cocaine into South Central Los Angeles and spreading the crack epidemic throughout the country were unsupported.” Even Nick Schou, Webb’s biographer, agreed that, “the story offered no evidence to support such sweeping conclusions, a fatal error that would ultimately destroy Webb, if not his editors.”
On December 10, 2004, Gary Webb took his own life. It is true that there were two bullet wounds in his head, which has raised suspicions that his death might not have been a suicide. However, no evidence has yet been presented contradicting the coroner’s findings, so we have to accept it as such for now.
And yes, Kill the Messenger (2014) is worth watching. It is a surprisingly accurate film starring Jeremy Renner. It portrays how Webb assembled the story and depicts the media’s tomfoolery and its impact on Webb’s life. Even Webb’s own son liked it.
I fundamentally disagree with the premise of this statement and you should also.
“What we are being told happened here is completely impossible, but no one has presented anything more plausible, so we must accept this as truth and move on.”
Absolutely not. Bullshit. Fuck that. You should be ashamed of yourself for even writing that in public. You’re being lied to, right to your face, boldly and unashamedly, to rug-sweep a set of extremely illegal governmental actions without any sort of culpability - and your response to this is “Well, better not worry about that then!”
How could you possibly think that’s the correct response to that?
Bit late to do something about it now, we missed that bus, but I can draw a straight line from Ronald Reagan to Contra to this to the fascist hellhole of an American society that find ourselves in in the current day. If anyone had held their government responsible for anything it has done at any point in time, we might have shifted that path just a little.
Bullseye. Anyone swallowing the official story about Webb is naive at best. I mean what the fuck “It’s impossible so we must accept it as truth?”, again what the actual fuck? How does someone think like this?
Then prove it instead of just speculating.
The proof we do have is that Webb became extremely depressed because of all the media slander, his loss of credibility as a journalist from his peers and the general population and ultimately, the resignation from his position, inability to find a job, and loss of his mortgage and house a week prior to his death.
What we have zero proof of is why the CIA would want to kill someone that didn’t break the significant story in the first place, was already widely discredited and shunned, and EIGHT years after the news had died down.
Also, it is not impossible to have a suicide with two bullets. It happens rarely when the first shot fails to be immediately lethal. Considering the first bullet went through his left cheek, it probably didn’t kill him. It was the second shot that hit an artery.
On top of that, Webb’s own family firmly believe it was a suicide and they would appreciate it if you would treat it as such as they knew him a lot more than you did.
Yeah, I’ll get right on that, 21 years after his death. I was 9 years old at the time.
And surely, the CIA has never ever had someone killed under suspicious circumstances…
Or engineered said circumstances…
Or blamed an obvious murder on suicide…
I remember when I used to think the government told the truth.