dsmaster7173@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agoimportant rulepostlemmy.worldimagemessage-square710fedilinkarrow-up1761arrow-down10cross-posted to: 196@lemmy.world
arrow-up1761arrow-down1imageimportant rulepostlemmy.worlddsmaster7173@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agomessage-square710fedilinkcross-posted to: 196@lemmy.world
minus-squarePlasmaK@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoYes, they were both bad. Enemy of my enemy is not necessary my friend.
minus-squaresnoby@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoI’m pointing out why the state can’t just go away
minus-squarePlasmaK@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoSo you agree that the premise that the state would just wither away is false?
minus-squaresnoby@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoNo, I’m saying the state can’t just wither away if it’s necessary to defend against counter-revolutions and imperialism.
minus-squarePlasmaK@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoDefend what? Social democracy without democracy?
Yes, they were both bad. Enemy of my enemy is not necessary my friend.
I’m pointing out why the state can’t just go away
So you agree that the premise that the state would just wither away is false?
No, I’m saying the state can’t just wither away if it’s necessary to defend against counter-revolutions and imperialism.
Defend what? Social democracy without democracy?