Ann Archy@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoBOEING vs NASAlemmy.worldimagemessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1232arrow-down18
arrow-up1224arrow-down1imageBOEING vs NASAlemmy.worldAnn Archy@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareHildegarde@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up46arrow-down6·1 year agoWhy are you comparing the budget of one single spacecraft with an entire production run of a model of airplane? That’s not a reasonable comparison.
minus-squareMorpheus@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down1·1 year agoYeah its too fair to boing because they are not sending shit tp fucking space
minus-squareBakerBagel@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoModern airplanes are also have crazy complicated systems compared to the Apollo program. But also the MAX eas supotti be a quick and easy upgrade to the existing 737-800, so clearly theu fucked up along the way
minus-squareJustin@lemmy.jlh.namelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 year agoBecause Boeing should have economy of scale benefits by selling $180B worth of aircraft, while Apollo 13 was a bespoke, single-use, cutting-edge spacecraft on a much smaller budget.
minus-squaregmtom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoWasn’t it exactly the same as most of the other apollo craft?
Why are you comparing the budget of one single spacecraft with an entire production run of a model of airplane? That’s not a reasonable comparison.
Yeah its too fair to boing because they are not sending shit tp fucking space
Modern airplanes are also have crazy complicated systems compared to the Apollo program.
But also the MAX eas supotti be a quick and easy upgrade to the existing 737-800, so clearly theu fucked up along the way
Hahahaha! Well nailed!
Because Boeing should have economy of scale benefits by selling $180B worth of aircraft, while Apollo 13 was a bespoke, single-use, cutting-edge spacecraft on a much smaller budget.
Wasn’t it exactly the same as most of the other apollo craft?
Because this is Lemmy