I run into this same issue with youtube meme compilations. If the entire compilation is funny home videos THOSE ARENT MEMES

But you don’t need to misuse language to assign responsibility. It is their responsibility for breaking the system. Saying the system was always designed for this removes responsibility.

In the past I’ve heard the second opinion primarily from people who say that a system is intended to work in the way that it does. Which makes the statement tautological: The system is working exactly as it works. I find this view unconvincing.

:D

The what

For the thrill of the heist?

If the debt grows faster than your investment I don’t see how squirreling away some money is smart. The amount your investment “builds up” will be less than the amount it will have saved you if you paid off your debt.

You cannot meaningfully invest without at least a few hundred spare dollars. Expecting a multi-hundred-percent increase is not realistic.

That’s unfortunate

Pepper Jack wins no diff

That’s really interesting

Woah I’m totally convinced now you’re so right actually

Right.

Idk but you’ve found the exact opposite of this other post: https://lemmy.world/post/35958449/19406354

Which, as we all know, means: right

If you took away someone’s right they would be all left

What if they’re both guys

I would like to join your new political party

By this logic right and left on their own don’t mean anything either. Referring to the category that includes ancap and anarchist ideologies as “libertarian” is coherent and clear-- in other words, it’s meaningful.